Suppr超能文献

正常和糖尿病受试者振动及热阈值测试的方差成分

Components of variance for vibratory and thermal threshold testing in normal and diabetic subjects.

作者信息

Gelber D A, Pfeifer M A, Broadstone V L, Munster E W, Peterson M, Arezzo J C, Shamoon H, Zeidler A, Clements R, Greene D A

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield 62794-9230, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 1995 Jul-Sep;9(3):170-6. doi: 10.1016/1056-8727(94)00042-m.

Abstract

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is commonly used in the assessment of diabetic neuropathy. However, little data are available on the reliability of tactile and thermal testing devices. Reproducibility of QST measures between centers has not been previously reported. This study was designed to validate QST testing procedures and determine if these devices are suitable for large scale multicenter clinical trials. Finger and toe vibratory (Vf, Vt) and thermal (Tf, Tt) thresholds were determined for ten normal individuals by a two-alternative forced-choice procedure using the Optacon Tactile Tester (OTT) and Thermal Sensitivity Tester (TST). Threshold measurements were reproducible between technologists and had a day-to-day coefficient of variation of Vf 20%, Vt 23%, Tf 41%, and Tt 95%. Thresholds were determined for 140 normal individuals at six centers. Mean threshold values between centers were not significantly different. Center-to-center coefficients of variation (CV) were Vf 44%, Vt 45%, Tf 47%, and Tt 87%. There was no significant difference in threshold measures with regard to sex, side studied, presence of calluses, or skin temperature. Vf thresholds significantly correlated with age (p < 0.01). There was no correlation between either vibratory or thermal thresholds in normal individuals, and nerve conduction velocities (NCV). Thermal and vibratory thresholds were determined for 98 diabetic patients. Diabetic subjects without clinical evidence of neuropathy were not significantly different from normal individuals, but diabetic patients with neuropathy had increased thresholds compared to normals (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

定量感觉测试(QST)常用于评估糖尿病性神经病变。然而,关于触觉和热觉测试设备可靠性的数据却很少。此前尚未报道过各中心之间QST测量的可重复性。本研究旨在验证QST测试程序,并确定这些设备是否适用于大规模多中心临床试验。使用Optacon触觉测试仪(OTT)和热敏感性测试仪(TST),通过二项必选法为10名正常个体测定手指和脚趾的振动觉(Vf、Vt)和热觉(Tf、Tt)阈值。技术人员之间的阈值测量具有可重复性,Vf、Vt、Tf和Tt的每日变异系数分别为20%、23%、41%和95%。在六个中心为140名正常个体测定了阈值。各中心之间的平均阈值无显著差异。中心间变异系数(CV)为:Vf 44%、Vt 45%、Tf 47%、Tt 87%。在性别、研究侧别、胼胝体存在情况或皮肤温度方面,阈值测量无显著差异。Vf阈值与年龄显著相关(p < 0.01)。正常个体的振动觉或热觉阈值与神经传导速度(NCV)之间无相关性。为98名糖尿病患者测定了热觉和振动觉阈值。无神经病变临床证据的糖尿病受试者与正常个体无显著差异,但有神经病变的糖尿病患者与正常人相比阈值升高(p < 0.05)。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验