Suppr超能文献

[造血干细胞采集的两种方法(血细胞分离术和骨髓采集)中焦虑与疼痛的比较]

[Comparison of anxiety and pain in two procedures of hematopoietic stem cell collection: cytapheresis and bone marrow collection].

作者信息

Macquart-Moulin G, Auquier P, Le Corroller A G, Blache J L, Novakovitch G, Blaise D, Faucher C, Viens P, Maraninchi D, Moatti J P

机构信息

Inserm U379, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Bull Cancer. 1995 Jul;82(7):582-8.

PMID:7549121
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare anxiety, pain and discomfort of cancer patients submitted to two procedures of hematopoietic stem cells collection: peripheral blood stem cells collection (PBSCC) or bone marrow collection (BMC). Patients, randomized (July 1993-February 1994), in view of autograft, to receive the first procedure or the second one, completed self-administered questionnaires before, during and after the procedure. Anxiety was evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Pain was assessed using visual analogical scale (VAS) and McGill Pain questionnaire. Before the procedure, in comparison with PBSCC patients (n = 40), BMC patients (n = 25) experienced more State-anxiety due to the procedure approach (p < 0.01) and more trouble or inconvenience for having to come and stay at the hospital (p < 0.0001). During the procedure, pain related to BMC, as assessed by VAS, is significatively higher than pain induced by PBSCC, whichever the access used (p < 0.001). The McGill total score is twice as high for BMC patients than for patients submitted to PBSCC with femoral catheter (n = 19). The latter patients significatively reported more pain than patients without femoral catheter (n = 21). At the discharge from hospital, 32% of BMC patients judged the procedure quite difficult vs 5% of PBSCC patients (p < 0.05). These results explain a higher acceptability of the peripheral blood stem cells collection.

摘要

本研究旨在比较接受两种造血干细胞采集程序的癌症患者的焦虑、疼痛和不适情况:外周血干细胞采集(PBSCC)或骨髓采集(BMC)。鉴于自体移植,患者于1993年7月至1994年2月被随机分配接受第一种程序或第二种程序,并在程序前、程序中和程序后完成自我管理问卷。焦虑通过状态-特质焦虑量表进行评估。疼痛使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和麦吉尔疼痛问卷进行评估。在程序前,与PBSCC患者(n = 40)相比,BMC患者(n = 25)由于程序方法而经历更多的状态焦虑(p < 0.01),并且因必须前来并留在医院而遇到更多麻烦或不便(p < 0.0001)。在程序期间,无论使用何种通路,通过VAS评估,与BMC相关的疼痛明显高于PBSCC引起的疼痛(p < 0.001)。BMC患者的麦吉尔总分是接受股静脉导管PBSCC患者(n = 19)的两倍。后一组患者报告的疼痛明显多于无股静脉导管患者(n = 21)。出院时,32%的BMC患者认为该程序相当困难,而PBSCC患者为5%(p < 0.05)。这些结果解释了外周血干细胞采集具有更高的可接受性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验