Kennedy L G, Jenkinson T R, Mallorie P A, Whitelock H C, Garrett S L, Calin A
Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath.
Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Aug;34(8):767-70. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/34.8.767.
The objective was to compare the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) with radiology as a measure of disease outcome. Fifty-three patients, covering the entire spectrum of disease severity, were blindly and independently assessed using the BASMI (total of five standardized measurements, scoring range 0-10) and a radiology score of the four main spinal areas affected by ankylosing spondylitis (AS). BASMI correlates positively with the total radiology score (r = 0.74), while the individual BASMI scores for cervical rotation (r = 0.59), wall to tragus (r = 0.61), lumbar side flexion (r = 0.56), lumbar flexion (r = 0.68) and intermalleolar distance (r = 0.50) correlate positively with their respective radiology scores. BASMI and radiology do not relate well to each other as BASMI takes account of normal physical limitation and soft tissue involvement. In addition, although radiology scores are termed a 'gold standard', they are unreliable. Therefore, BASMI may be judged to be more important in assessing AS and become a 'gold standard' itself.
目的是比较巴斯强直性脊柱炎测量指数(BASMI)与放射学检查作为疾病转归的衡量指标。对53例涵盖疾病严重程度全谱的患者,采用BASMI(共五项标准化测量,评分范围0 - 10)和强直性脊柱炎(AS)所累及的四个主要脊柱区域的放射学评分进行盲法独立评估。BASMI与放射学总分呈正相关(r = 0.74),而BASMI中颈椎旋转(r = 0.59)、耳垂至墙壁距离(r = 0.61)、腰椎侧屈(r = 0.56)、腰椎前屈(r = 0.68)及内踝间距(r = 0.50)的单项评分与其各自的放射学评分呈正相关。由于BASMI考虑了正常的身体限制和软组织受累情况,所以BASMI与放射学检查的相关性不佳。此外,尽管放射学评分被称为“金标准”,但它们并不可靠。因此,在评估AS时,BASMI可能被认为更重要,并可能成为其自身的“金标准”。