Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜剥脱术中的血流动力学不稳定与心肌缺血:丙泊酚与异氟烷的比较

Haemodynamic instability and myocardial ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of propofol and isoflurane.

作者信息

Mutch W A, White I W, Donen N, Thomson I R, Rosenbloom M, Cheang M, West M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1995 Jul;42(7):577-87. doi: 10.1007/BF03011874.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two anaesthetic protocols for haemodynamic instability (heart rate (HR) or mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 80 or > 120% of ward baseline values) measured at one-minute intervals during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). One group received propofol/alfentanil (Group Prop; n = 14) and the other isoflurane/alfentanil (Group Iso; n = 13). Periods of haemodynamic instability were correlated to episodes of myocardial ischaemia as assessed by Holter monitoring (begun the evening before surgery and ceasing the morning of the first postoperative day). In Group Prop, anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 30 micrograms.kg-1 i.v., propofol up to 1.5 mg.kg-1 and vecuronium 0.15 mg.kg-1, and maintained with infusions of propofol at 3-12 mg.kg-1.hr-1 and alfentanil at 30 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1. In Group Iso, anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil and vecuronium as above, thiopentone up to 4 mg.kg-1 and maintained with isoflurane and alfentanil infusion. Phenylephrine was infused to support MAP at 110 +/- 10% of ward values during cross-clamp of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in both groups. Emergence hypertension and/or tachycardia was treated with labetalol, diazoxide or propranolol. Myocardial ischaemia was defined as ST-segment depression of > or = 1 mm (60 msec past the J-point) persisting for > or = one minute. For the entire anaesthetic course (induction to post-emergence), there was no difference between groups for either duration or magnitude outside the < 80 or > 120% range for HR or MAP. However, when the period of emergence from anaesthesia (reversal of neuromuscular blockade to post-extubation) was assessed, more patients were hypertensive (P = 0.004) and required vasodilator therapy in Group Iso (10/13 vs 5/14; P = 0.038 Fisher's Exact Test). The mean dose of labetalol was greater in Group Iso (P = 0.035). No patient demonstrated myocardial ischaemia during ICA cross-clamp. On emergence, 6/13 patients in Group Iso demonstrated myocardial ischaemia compared with 1/14 in Group Prop (P = 0.029). Therefore, supporting the blood pressure with phenylephrine, during the period of ICA cross-clamping, appears to be safe as we did not observe any myocardial ischaemia at this time. During emergence from anaesthesia, haemodynamic instability was associated with myocardial ischaemia. Under these specific experimental conditions, with emergence, hypertension and myocardial ischaemia were more prevalent with more frequent pharmacological interventions in patients receiving isoflurane.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种麻醉方案用于颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)期间每隔一分钟测量的血流动力学不稳定情况(心率(HR)或平均动脉压(MAP)<80%或>病房基线值的120%)。一组接受丙泊酚/阿芬太尼(丙泊酚组;n = 14),另一组接受异氟烷/阿芬太尼(异氟烷组;n = 13)。血流动力学不稳定期与动态心电图监测评估的心肌缺血发作相关(术前晚开始,术后第一天早晨停止)。在丙泊酚组,麻醉诱导采用静脉注射阿芬太尼30微克/千克、丙泊酚达1.5毫克/千克和维库溴铵0.15毫克/千克,并通过以3 - 12毫克/千克·小时-1输注丙泊酚和30微克/千克·小时-1输注阿芬太尼维持麻醉。在异氟烷组,麻醉诱导采用上述阿芬太尼和维库溴铵,硫喷妥钠达4毫克/千克,并通过异氟烷和阿芬太尼输注维持麻醉。两组在颈内动脉(ICA)交叉钳夹期间均输注去氧肾上腺素以维持MAP在病房值的110±10%。出现高血压和/或心动过速时用拉贝洛尔、二氮嗪或普萘洛尔治疗。心肌缺血定义为ST段压低≥1毫米(J点后60毫秒)持续≥1分钟。对于整个麻醉过程(诱导至苏醒后),两组在HR或MAP低于80%或高于120%范围之外的持续时间或幅度方面无差异。然而,在评估麻醉苏醒期(神经肌肉阻滞逆转至拔管后)时,异氟烷组更多患者出现高血压(P = 0.004)且需要血管扩张剂治疗(10/13 vs 5/14;P = 0.038,Fisher精确检验)。异氟烷组拉贝洛尔的平均剂量更大(P = 0.035)。ICA交叉钳夹期间无患者出现心肌缺血。苏醒时,异氟烷组13例患者中有6例出现心肌缺血,而丙泊酚组14例中有1例出现心肌缺血(P = 0.029)。因此,在ICA交叉钳夹期间用去氧肾上腺素维持血压似乎是安全的,因为此时我们未观察到任何心肌缺血情况。在麻醉苏醒期,血流动力学不稳定与心肌缺血相关。在这些特定实验条件下,苏醒时,接受异氟烷的患者高血压和心肌缺血更普遍,且需要更频繁的药物干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验