Peskin R M, Siegelman L I
Department of Dental Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, USA.
Dent Clin North Am. 1995 Jul;39(3):677-88.
According to the American Heart Association, "Successful completion of an ACLS course means in accordance with the cognitive and performance standards of the American Heart Association. It does not warrant performance, nor does it, per se, qualify or authorize a person to perform any procedure. It in no way related to licensure, which is a function of the appropriate legislative, health or educational authority." The same can be said for BLS; however, with the recent revisions in ECC programs, even this disclaimer has been eliminated from the most recent textbooks in BLS and ACLS. This is in keeping with "...the American Heart Association's reaffirmation of its role as an educational resource rather than as a certifying agency." Lay public course participants in BLS (which technically includes dentists) will now receive course participation cards. Health care provider course participants will continue to receive "course completion cards" if all criteria have been satisfied by the student. The trend is to categorize what was previously termed testing as evaluation. Certification has become a thing of the past. It is unclear at this time what the impact this policy change will have on agencies who rely upon documentation from the American Heart Association to satisfy requirements that have been imposed upon dentists and other health professionals for initial licensure and relicensure. Semantics aside, one thing that remains clear is the expectation of the dentist with regards to emergency management. Expertise (for lack of a better term) in specific aspects of ECC remains a standard. For all dentists, expertise in BLS is that standard. For dentists administering deep sedation and general anesthesia, expertise in ACLS is the community standard. Although there is some ambiguity for those dentists administering conscious sedation, at the very least, they should have expertise in BLS. In addition, they are strongly encouraged to have expertise in ACLS, particularly because the limited hours of training in conscious sedation provide less medical background than is acquired during training in deep sedation and general anesthesia. In addition, the dentist is ultimately responsible for the demeanor of his or her office and staff. In the prehospital dental office setting, the matter of converting a dental office team geared to efficient delivery of dental procedures, into a team primed to perform emergency cardiac care seems daunting. This is especially so if the dentist has little undergraduate or clinical preparation for managing life-threatening emergencies. Therefore, an emergency management plan (with oversight for its implementation by the dentist) is of paramount importance.
根据美国心脏协会的说法,“成功完成高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)课程意味着符合美国心脏协会的认知和操作标准。它并不保证实际操作能力,本身也不能使一个人具备资格或授权其执行任何程序。它与执照颁发毫无关系,执照颁发是由适当的立法、卫生或教育当局负责的职能。”基础生命支持(BLS)也是如此;然而,随着急诊心血管护理(ECC)项目的最新修订,即使是这一免责声明也已从BLS和ACLS的最新教科书中删除。这与“……美国心脏协会重申其作为教育资源而非认证机构的角色”是一致的。BLS的非专业公众课程参与者(从技术上讲包括牙医)现在将获得课程参与卡。如果学生满足所有标准,医疗保健提供者课程参与者将继续获得“课程结业卡”。目前的趋势是将以前称为测试的内容归类为评估。认证已成为过去式。目前尚不清楚这一政策变化将对那些依赖美国心脏协会文件来满足对牙医和其他医疗专业人员初始执照颁发和重新执照颁发要求的机构产生何种影响。撇开语义不谈,有一点仍然很清楚,那就是牙医对急诊管理的期望。ECC特定方面的专业知识(找不到更好的术语)仍然是一项标准。对所有牙医来说,BLS方面的专业知识就是这项标准。对于实施深度镇静和全身麻醉的牙医来说,ACLS方面的专业知识是行业标准。尽管对于实施清醒镇静的牙医来说存在一些模糊之处,但至少他们应该具备BLS方面的专业知识。此外,强烈鼓励他们具备ACLS方面的专业知识,特别是因为清醒镇静的有限培训时间所提供的医学背景比深度镇静和全身麻醉培训期间获得的要少。此外,牙医最终要对其办公室和工作人员的行为负责。在院前牙科诊所环境中,将一个致力于高效提供牙科程序的牙科团队转变为一个准备好进行紧急心脏护理的团队,这似乎令人生畏。如果牙医在管理危及生命的紧急情况方面几乎没有本科或临床准备,情况尤其如此。因此,一个急诊管理计划(由牙医监督其实施)至关重要。