Pu M, Griffin B P, Vandervoort P M, Leung D Y, Cosgrove D M, Thomas J D
Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195-5064, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct;26(4):1047-53. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00259-2.
This study investigated the accuracy of mitral inflow quantification using biplane transesophageal echocardiography.
Mitral stroke volume can be reliably quantified by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, but previous studies involving monoplane transesophageal echocardiography have yielded mixed results.
Thirty patients without mitral regurgitation were prospectively examined immediately before cardiovascular surgery. Mitral annulus diameter was measured in the transverse (d1) and longitudinal views (d2) by biplane transesophageal echocardiography. Assuming an elliptic shape, the annular area was calculated as pi d1d2/4; area was also calculated from single-plane data assuming a circular annular shape as pi d2/4. The time-velocity integral of mitral annular Doppler velocity was then multiplied by annular area to yield stroke volume. These data were compared with simultaneous thermodilution measurements by linear regression.
Good correlations were observed between thermodilution (x) and Doppler (y) measurements of stroke volume (SV) (r = 0.86, p < 0.01, delta SV [y-x] = 2.64 +/- 9.86 ml for single four-chamber view; r = 0.77, p < 0.01, delta SV = 1.82 +/- 12.59 ml for two-chamber view; r = 0.94, p < 0.001, delta SV = 1.78 +/- 5.90 ml for biplane measurements) with similar data for cardiac output (r = 0.82, r = 0.74 and r = 0.92, respectively). The biplane measurements were most accurate and had less variability in individual patients (p < 0.05). This finding was supported by a numerical model that demonstrated (for an ellipse of eccentricity 1.5:1) that even maximal misalignment of biplane diameters yielded only 8% area overestimation, whereas single-plane calculations assuming a circular shape produced a variation in area of 225%.
This study validates the accuracy of measurements of mitral inflow using biplane transesophageal echocardiography with potential application for quantification of valvular regurgitation in the operating room. The results are further generalizable, indicating that orthogonal biplane measurements are both necessary and sufficient to ensure accuracy in area calculation for any elliptic structure.
本研究调查了使用双平面经食管超声心动图进行二尖瓣血流定量分析的准确性。
经胸多普勒超声心动图可可靠地定量二尖瓣每搏量,但以往涉及单平面经食管超声心动图的研究结果不一。
前瞻性地对30例无二尖瓣反流的患者在心血管手术前即刻进行检查。通过双平面经食管超声心动图在横向(d1)和纵向视图(d2)中测量二尖瓣环直径。假设为椭圆形,计算瓣环面积为πd1d2/4;也根据单平面数据假设瓣环为圆形,计算面积为πd2/4。然后将二尖瓣环多普勒速度的时间-速度积分乘以瓣环面积得出每搏量。通过线性回归将这些数据与同时进行的热稀释测量结果进行比较。
热稀释法(x)与多普勒法(y)测量的每搏量(SV)之间观察到良好的相关性(单四腔视图:r = 0.86,p < 0.01,ΔSV [y - x] = 2.64 ± 9.86 ml;双腔视图:r = 0.77,p < 0.01,ΔSV = 1.82 ± 12.59 ml;双平面测量:r = 0.94,p < 0.001,ΔSV = 1.78 ± 5.90 ml),心输出量的数据相似(分别为r = 0.82、r = 0.74和r = 0.92)。双平面测量最准确,且个体患者的变异性较小(p < 0.05)。这一发现得到了一个数值模型的支持,该模型表明(对于偏心率为1.5:1的椭圆),即使双平面直径最大程度地未对准,面积高估也仅为8%,而假设为圆形的单平面计算产生的面积变化为225%。
本研究验证了使用双平面经食管超声心动图测量二尖瓣血流的准确性,其在手术室中对瓣膜反流定量分析具有潜在应用价值。结果更具普遍性,表明正交双平面测量对于确保任何椭圆形结构面积计算的准确性既必要又充分。