Geiss H K
Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 1995 Jun;30 Suppl:414-20. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(95)90046-2.
Uniform and standardized recommendations for reprocessing of anaesthetic and ventilatory equipment are still lacking. The uncertainty in this field is underscored by the various methods which are described in the literature which include pasteurization, immersion baths, formaldehyde cabinets, automated washers/disinfectors and sterilization procedures like autoclaving, ethylene oxide and gaseous formaldehyde. Based on the classification of anaesthetic and ventilatory equipment as semi-critical items, high level disinfection must be regarded as the appropriate decontamination procedure. In contrast to automated washers the other above-mentioned disinfection procedures lack an integrated and all inclusive reprocessing cycle which consists of cleaning, disinfection, rinsing and drying. In view of the increasing demands of employee safety, environmental suitability, cost-effectiveness and quality assurance in hospital hygiene, only automated washers/disinfectors--either based on hot water disinfection or chemothermic processing--fulfil the basic requirements for safe and standardized reprocessing of anaesthetic and ventilatory equipment.
目前仍缺乏关于麻醉和通气设备再处理的统一且标准化的建议。文献中描述的各种方法凸显了该领域的不确定性,这些方法包括巴氏消毒法、浸泡槽、甲醛柜、自动清洗/消毒器以及诸如高压蒸汽灭菌、环氧乙烷和气态甲醛等灭菌程序。基于将麻醉和通气设备归类为半关键物品,高水平消毒必须被视为适当的去污程序。与自动清洗器不同,上述其他消毒程序缺乏由清洗、消毒、冲洗和干燥组成的综合且全面的再处理循环。鉴于医院卫生领域对员工安全、环境适应性、成本效益和质量保证的要求不断提高,只有基于热水消毒或化学热加工的自动清洗/消毒器才能满足麻醉和通气设备安全、标准化再处理的基本要求。