• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格的层次与领域:引言

Levels and domains in personality: an introduction.

作者信息

Emmons R A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.

出版信息

J Pers. 1995 Sep;63(3):341-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00499.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00499.x
PMID:7562359
Abstract

This special issue is centered around the problem of levels and domains in personality functioning. What kind of constructs--and at what levels and in what domains--are needed to understand what a person is like? To account for the complexity and scope of human lives, personality psychologists have traditionally put forth lists and taxonomies of factors, features, and variables that must be taken into consideration in formulating an adequate psychological portrait of the whole person. The five-factor model of personality traits has recently been offered as a comprehensive framework; however, critical analyses of the trait concept have revealed the limitations of a trait-based model of personality. Recognizing that the concept of trait is indispensable to a vital psychology of personality, this special issue aims to (a) communicate recent developments and organizational frameworks for understanding the person at multiple levels and in varied domains, and (b) articulate and elaborate units of analysis that, when combined with trait assessments, yield a psychology of personality that is commensurate with the complexity of individual functioning and that offers greater potential for the attainment of the original goals of the discipline.

摘要

本期特刊围绕人格功能中的层次和领域问题展开。需要什么样的构念——在何种层次以及哪些领域——才能理解一个人是什么样的?为了解释人类生活的复杂性和范围,人格心理学家传统上提出了一系列因素、特征和变量的列表及分类法,在勾勒一个完整的人的充分心理画像时必须加以考虑。最近,人格特质的五因素模型被作为一个综合框架提出;然而,对特质概念的批判性分析揭示了基于特质的人格模型的局限性。鉴于特质概念对于重要的人格心理学不可或缺,本期特刊旨在:(a)传达近期关于在多个层次和不同领域理解人的发展情况和组织框架;(b)明确阐述分析单元,这些单元与特质评估相结合时,能产生一种与个体功能的复杂性相称、且为实现该学科最初目标提供更大潜力的人格心理学。

相似文献

1
Levels and domains in personality: an introduction.人格的层次与领域:引言
J Pers. 1995 Sep;63(3):341-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00499.x.
2
The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal.人格的五因素模型:批判性评价。
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):329-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x.
3
Clinical use of the five-factor model: an introduction.五因素模型的临床应用:引言
J Pers Assess. 1991 Dec;57(3):393-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5703_1.
4
Traits and trade-offs are insufficient for evolutionary personality psychology.特质与权衡对于进化人格心理学而言并不充分。
Am Psychol. 2007 Dec;62(9):1073-4. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1073.
5
A clinical-empirical model of personality: life after the Mischelian ice age and the NEO-lithic era.
J Pers. 1995 Sep;63(3):495-524. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00504.x.
6
Advancements in the field of personality development.人格发展领域的进展。
J Adolesc. 2014 Jul;37(5):763-9. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 1.
7
Connecting Personality Structure and Dynamics: Towards a More Evidence-Based and Clinically Useful Diagnostic Scheme.连接人格结构与动力学:迈向更具循证性且临床实用的诊断方案。
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):431-48. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.431.
8
A new Big Five: fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality.一种新的“大五”人格:人格综合科学的基本原则。
Am Psychol. 2006 Apr;61(3):204-17. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204.
9
A multifactorial approach to the study of gender characteristics.
J Pers. 1995 Sep;63(3):681-710. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00510.x.
10
Interpreting "Personality" Taxonomies: Why Previous Models Cannot Capture Individual-Specific Experiencing, Behaviour, Functioning and Development. Major Taxonomic Tasks Still Lay Ahead.解读“人格”分类法:为何先前的模型无法捕捉个体特定的体验、行为、功能及发展。主要的分类任务仍任重道远。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Dec;49(4):600-55. doi: 10.1007/s12124-014-9281-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Does personality affect health-related quality of life? A systematic review.人格会影响健康相关生活质量吗?一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 29;12(3):e0173806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173806. eCollection 2017.