• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连接人格结构与动力学:迈向更具循证性且临床实用的诊断方案。

Connecting Personality Structure and Dynamics: Towards a More Evidence-Based and Clinically Useful Diagnostic Scheme.

作者信息

Hopwood Christopher J, Zimmermann Johannes, Pincus Aaron L, Krueger Robert F

机构信息

Michigan State University, East Lansing.

University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):431-48. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.431.

DOI:10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.431
PMID:26200845
Abstract

The purpose of this special issue of the Journal of Personality Disorders is to promote the integration of personality structure and dynamics towards more evidence-based and clinically useful conceptualizations of personality pathology. In this article, we describe a contemporary model of personality structure that is useful for distinguishing patients from one another and the connections between this structure and within-person dynamics that occur across different levels of an individual personality, across situations, and within situations. In so doing, we connect the personality trait tradition that has tended to emphasize stable individual differences with traditions that have tended to focus on the more dynamic aspects of interpersonal behavior and emotional experience. We then introduce the empirical articles in this special issue within this integrative context, in order to demonstrate the value in connecting personality structure to dynamics for research and practice.

摘要

《人格障碍杂志》这一特刊的目的是推动人格结构与动力学的整合,朝着更具循证性且对临床有用的人格病理学概念化方向发展。在本文中,我们描述了一种当代人格结构模型,它有助于区分不同患者,以及该结构与个体人格不同层面、不同情境间及情境内发生的个体内部动力学之间的联系。在此过程中,我们将倾向于强调稳定个体差异的人格特质传统与倾向于关注人际行为和情感体验更具动态性方面的传统联系起来。然后,我们在这一整合背景下介绍本期特刊中的实证文章,以展示将人格结构与动力学相联系对研究和实践的价值。

相似文献

1
Connecting Personality Structure and Dynamics: Towards a More Evidence-Based and Clinically Useful Diagnostic Scheme.连接人格结构与动力学:迈向更具循证性且临床实用的诊断方案。
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):431-48. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.431.
2
The interpersonal core of personality pathology.人格病理学的人际核心。
J Pers Disord. 2013 Jun;27(3):270-95. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.3.270.
3
Clinical use of the five-factor model: an introduction.五因素模型的临床应用:引言
J Pers Assess. 1991 Dec;57(3):393-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5703_1.
4
Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale.DSM-5 第一部分人格和人格障碍评估与诊断的拟议变更:描述和基本原理。
Personal Disord. 2011 Jan;2(1):4-22. doi: 10.1037/a0021891.
5
Personality theory. Clinical practice, social development, and the biology of individual differences.人格理论。临床实践、社会发展与个体差异生物学。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Aug;52(8):633-6; discussion 654-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950200023004.
6
The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings.五因素模型及其在临床环境中的评估。
J Pers Assess. 1991 Dec;57(3):399-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5703_2.
7
Diagnosis, assessment, and individual complexity.诊断、评估与个体复杂性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Aug;52(8):637-8; discussion 654-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950200027005.
8
Daily Interpersonal and Affective Dynamics in Personality Disorder.人格障碍中的日常人际与情感动态
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):503-25. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.503.
9
Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part II: Clinical application.DSM-5 第二部分:临床应用人格及人格障碍评估和诊断的拟议变更。
Personal Disord. 2011 Jan;2(1):23-40. doi: 10.1037/a0021892.
10
Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: the Five-Factor Model.整合正常和异常人格结构:五因素模型。
J Pers. 2012 Dec;80(6):1471-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00776.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Bringing Light Into the Dark: Associations of Fire Interest and Fire Setting With the Dark Tetrad.照亮黑暗:对火的兴趣和纵火行为与黑暗三性格的关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 27;13:876575. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876575. eCollection 2022.
2
Mentalization and dissociation after adverse childhood experiences.遭受不良童年经历后的心理化和解离。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 26;12(1):6809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10787-8.
3
Machine learning approaches for parsing comorbidity/heterogeneity in antisociality and substance use disorders: A primer.
用于解析反社会行为和物质使用障碍中共病/异质性的机器学习方法:入门指南。
Personal Neurosci. 2021 Nov 15;4:e6. doi: 10.1017/pen.2021.2. eCollection 2021.
4
Using Interpersonal Dimensions of Personality and Personality Pathology to Examine Momentary and Idiographic Patterns of Alliance Rupture.利用人格和人格病理学的人际维度来审视联盟破裂的瞬间和独特模式。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 16;12:711109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711109. eCollection 2021.
5
Clinical Utility of Assessing Changes of Personality Functioning During Substance Misuse Treatment.评估物质滥用治疗期间人格功能变化的临床效用
Subst Abuse. 2020 Jul 3;14:1178221820931101. doi: 10.1177/1178221820931101. eCollection 2020.
6
Personality Structure and Attachment in Bipolar Disorder.双相情感障碍中的人格结构与依恋关系
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 11;11:410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00410. eCollection 2020.
7
Analysis of Driving Behavior Based on Dynamic Changes of Personality States.基于人格状态动态变化的驾驶行为分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 8;17(2):430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020430.
8
The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis.进行维度性人格障碍诊断的时候到了。
Personal Ment Health. 2018 Feb;12(1):82-86. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1408. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Behavioral Landscapes and Earth Mover's Distance: A New Approach for Studying Individual Differences in Density Distributions.行为景观与推土机距离:一种研究密度分布个体差异的新方法。
J Res Pers. 2017 Aug;69:191-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
10
Beyond comorbidity: Toward a dimensional and hierarchical approach to understanding psychopathology across the life span.超越共病:迈向一种理解全生命周期精神病理学的维度和层次方法。
Dev Psychopathol. 2016 Nov;28(4pt1):971-986. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416000651.