Black W C, Nease R F, Tosteson A N
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, N.H., USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 May 17;87(10):720-31. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.10.720.
The National Cancer Institute has recently changed its approach and has substituted summary-of-evidence statements for specific recommendations for breast cancer screening in women 40-50 years of age, leaving these women with a greater share of decision-making responsibility. To make an informed decision about breast cancer screening, women need accurate information about their breast cancer risk and the benefit of screening. Although it has been suggested that women younger than 50 years of age overestimate this risk and benefit, their estimates have not been quantified.
The purpose of this study was to determine how women 40-50 years of age perceive their risk of breast cancer and the effectiveness of screening and how these perceptions compare with estimates derived from epidemiologic studies of breast cancer incidence and randomized clinical trials of screening.
We mailed a questionnaire to 200 women, identified through the computerized medical records of Dartmouth-Hitchock Medical Center, who were between 40 and 50 years of age and had no history of breast cancer. Each woman was asked about her risk factors for breast cancer and asked to estimate her probabilities of developing breast cancer and dying of it within 10 years, with and without screening. The women's answers were compared with individual probabilities derived from the Gail et al. model, age-specific probabilities of developing and dying of breast cancer in the United States, and the results of randomized clinical trials of screening.
The mailed questionnaire was completed and returned by 145 (73%) of the 200 women. Respondents over-estimated their probability of dying of breast cancer within 10 years by more than 20-fold (median, 22.3; interquartile range, 11.1-74.2). Assuming a 10% relative risk reduction from screening, respondents overestimated the relative risk reduction by sixfold (median, 6.0; interquartile range, 5.0-7.5) and the absolute risk reduction more than 100-fold (median, 127.5; interquartile range, 47.1-399.6). The median perceived estimate of absolute risk reduction was 6.0 breast cancer deaths per 100 women; the median calculated estimate was only 0.04 per 100 women.
These findings suggest that many women younger than 50 years of age substantially overestimate their breast cancer risk and the effectiveness of screening.
A balanced presentation of information about breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness may improve decision making for women younger than 50 years of age and reduce their anxiety about breast cancer, regardless of whether they choose to be screened.
美国国立癌症研究所最近改变了其方法,用证据总结声明取代了针对40至50岁女性乳腺癌筛查的具体建议,这使得这些女性承担了更大的决策责任。为了就乳腺癌筛查做出明智的决定,女性需要有关其乳腺癌风险和筛查益处的准确信息。尽管有人认为50岁以下的女性高估了这种风险和益处,但她们的估计尚未得到量化。
本研究的目的是确定40至50岁的女性如何看待自己患乳腺癌的风险以及筛查的有效性,以及这些看法与从乳腺癌发病率的流行病学研究和筛查的随机临床试验得出的估计值相比如何。
我们通过达特茅斯-希区柯克医疗中心的计算机化病历识别出200名年龄在40至50岁之间且无乳腺癌病史的女性,并向她们邮寄了一份问卷。每位女性被问及她的乳腺癌风险因素,并被要求估计在有和没有筛查的情况下,她在10年内患乳腺癌和死于乳腺癌的概率。将这些女性的答案与从盖尔等人的模型得出的个体概率、美国特定年龄患乳腺癌和死于乳腺癌的概率以及筛查的随机临床试验结果进行比较。
200名女性中有145名(73%)完成并返还了邮寄的问卷。受访者高估了她们在10年内死于乳腺癌的概率超过20倍(中位数为22.3;四分位间距为11.1 - 74.2)。假设筛查可使相对风险降低10%,受访者高估了相对风险降低幅度6倍(中位数为6.0;四分位间距为5.0 - 7.5),高估了绝对风险降低幅度超过100倍(中位数为127.5;四分位间距为47.1 - 399.6)。绝对风险降低的感知估计中位数为每100名女性中有6.0例乳腺癌死亡;计算得出的估计中位数仅为每100名女性中有0.04例。
这些发现表明,许多50岁以下的女性大幅高估了她们患乳腺癌的风险和筛查的有效性。
关于乳腺癌风险和筛查有效性的信息的平衡呈现可能会改善50岁以下女性的决策,并减轻她们对乳腺癌的焦虑,无论她们是否选择接受筛查。