• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从每日两次服用地尔硫䓬转换为每日一次服用地尔硫䓬治疗稳定型心绞痛患者的临床疗效及安全性。

Clinical efficacy and safety of once-daily diltiazem in patients with stable angina pectoris switched from twice-daily diltiazem.

作者信息

Savard D, Lenis J, Juneau M, Jacob C, Boulet A P

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Hopital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995 Jul;26(1):85-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199507000-00014.

DOI:10.1097/00005344-199507000-00014
PMID:7564371
Abstract

The maintenance of angina control was assessed in this multicenter (three sites), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients with stable angina pectoris receiving twice-daily sustained-release (SR) diltiazem were switched to equivalent doses of once-daily controlled-delivery (CD) diltiazem or to diltiazem SR. Patients who were switched from diltiazem SR to diltiazem CD (n = 28) experienced a 5% increase in time to termination (p = 0.0004) on the exercise tolerance test (ETT), as well as an 8% improvement in time to onset of angina (p < 0.0001) on the ETT. A similar trend was observed in patients randomized to diltiazem SR (n = 7), which suggested a training effect, and, therefore, equal efficacy between diltiazem SR and diltiazem CD. During exercise testing in the diltiazem SR baseline phase, 77% of the patients did not experience angina, whereas 60% of the patients did not experience ST-segment depression. Following transfer to diltiazem CD, 79 and 61% of patients, respectively, remained angina- and ST-segment depression free. No significant changes in the number of angina attacks, nitroglycerin use, or any hemodynamic-related parameters were observed following transfer to diltiazem CD. Eleven percent of the patients receiving diltiazem CD experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were limited to headache and abdominal pain; these adverse events did not lead to discontinuation of treatment. These findings suggest that patients whose angina is controlled with twice-daily diltiazem SR can be safely and effectively switched to an equivalent daily dose of the once-daily diltiazem CD.

摘要

在这项多中心(三个地点)、随机、双盲、平行组研究中评估了心绞痛控制的维持情况。接受每日两次缓释(SR)地尔硫䓬的稳定型心绞痛患者被换用等量的每日一次控释(CD)地尔硫䓬或继续使用地尔硫䓬SR。从地尔硫䓬SR换用地尔硫䓬CD的患者(n = 28)在运动耐量试验(ETT)中终止时间增加了5%(p = 0.0004),在ETT中心绞痛发作时间改善了8%(p < 0.0001)。在随机分配到地尔硫䓬SR组的患者(n = 7)中观察到了类似趋势,这表明存在训练效应,因此地尔硫䓬SR和地尔硫䓬CD疗效相当。在地尔硫䓬SR基线期的运动测试中,77%的患者未出现心绞痛,而60%的患者未出现ST段压低。换用地尔硫䓬CD后,分别有79%和61%的患者仍无心绞痛和ST段压低。换用地尔硫䓬CD后,心绞痛发作次数、硝酸甘油使用量或任何血流动力学相关参数均未出现显著变化。接受地尔硫䓬CD治疗的患者中有11%出现了与治疗相关的不良事件,仅限于头痛和腹痛;这些不良事件未导致治疗中断。这些发现表明,心绞痛通过每日两次地尔硫䓬SR得到控制患者可以安全有效地换用等量的每日一次地尔硫䓬CD。

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy and safety of once-daily diltiazem in patients with stable angina pectoris switched from twice-daily diltiazem.从每日两次服用地尔硫䓬转换为每日一次服用地尔硫䓬治疗稳定型心绞痛患者的临床疗效及安全性。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995 Jul;26(1):85-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199507000-00014.
2
Mibefradil in the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris: comparative studies with other calcium antagonists.米贝拉地尔治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛:与其他钙拮抗剂的对比研究。
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Aug 21;80(4B):34C-39C. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00568-7.
3
Antianginal response to once-daily diltiazem CD in patients receiving concomitant beta-blockers, long-acting nitrates, or both. Diltiazem CD Study Group.接受β受体阻滞剂、长效硝酸盐类药物或两者联合治疗的患者,每日一次服用缓释地尔硫䓬的抗心绞痛反应。地尔硫䓬缓释片研究组。
Pharmacotherapy. 1997 Jul-Aug;17(4):760-6.
4
Improved efficacy and safety of controlled-release diltiazem compared to nifedipine may be related to its negative chronotropic effect.与硝苯地平相比,缓释地尔硫䓬疗效和安全性的提高可能与其负性变时作用有关。
Am J Ther. 2000 Jan;7(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200007010-00004.
5
A comparative study of once-daily amlodipine versus twice-daily diltiazem controlled release (CR) in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. Amlodipine Study Group.氨氯地平每日一次与地尔硫䓬缓释片每日两次治疗稳定型心绞痛的对比研究。氨氯地平研究组。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 3:233-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1007726109850.
6
A randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily modified-release diltiazem capsules with once-daily amlodipine tablets in patients with stable angina.一项针对稳定性心绞痛患者,每日一次服用缓释地尔硫䓬胶囊与每日一次服用氨氯地平片的疗效及耐受性的随机双盲对照研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;38(3):356-64. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200109000-00004.
7
An 8-week double-blind study of amlodipine and diltiazem in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris.氨氯地平和地尔硫䓬治疗稳定型劳力性心绞痛患者的为期8周的双盲研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S53-6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00017.
8
Antianginal efficacy and safety of controlled-delivery diltiazem QD versus an equivalent dose of immediate-release diltiazem TID.控释地尔硫䓬每日一次与等效剂量的速释地尔硫䓬每日三次的抗心绞痛疗效及安全性比较。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1995 Apr;9(2):319-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00878677.
9
Twenty-four hour efficacy of two dose levels of a once daily sustained-release diltiazem formulation in stable angina: a placebo-controlled trial. The Dildurang Study Group.一日一次缓释地尔硫䓬制剂两种剂量水平治疗稳定型心绞痛的24小时疗效:一项安慰剂对照试验。迪尔杜朗研究组
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;39(3):277-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04449.x.
10
Efficacy and safety of sustained-release diltiazem in stable angina pectoris.
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jan 1;57(1):6-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90941-0.