Yang R S, el-Masri H A, Thomas R S, Constan A A, Tessari J D
Department of Environmental Health, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1680, USA.
Toxicol Lett. 1995 Sep;79(1-3):193-200. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03370-z.
When dealing with health impacts of environmental or occupational exposure such as groundwater contamination from or remediation effort associated with hazardous waste sites, we are obviously not facing individual, single chemicals. Thus, we are immediately confronted with the following questions: (1) Is single chemical risk assessment approach applicable to the multiple chemicals in hazardous waste sites? (2) How do we handle risk assessment of chemical mixtures? Although there were pioneering and commendable efforts from the USEPA to formulate guidelines for risk assessment of chemical mixtures, these guidelines were principally based on additivity concept. As new scientific advances are made, improvement and refinement of risk assessment methodology will be anticipated. At Colorado State University (CSU), our research effort is devoted to the challenges and potential applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modeling in the risk assessment of chemical mixtures. With the ultimate goal of Predictive Toxicology, 3 specific research projects are described: (1) PBPK/PD modeling of toxicologic interactions between trichloroethylene (TCE) and 1,1-dichloroethylene (1,1-DCE) and the investigation and defining of an 'Interaction Threshold'; (2) PBPK/PD modeling of toxicologic interactions between Kepone and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and the coupling of Monte Carlo simulation for the prediction of acute toxicity; (3) PBPK modeling of the inhibition of pharmacokinetics and enzyme kinetics of TCE caused by low-level, repeated dosing of a chemical mixture of 7 groundwater contaminants. Since this paper is meant to be a commentary and the emphasis is on approaches for dealing with chemical mixtures, detailed presentation of data is avoided. These examples illustrate partially our ongoing research activities and the related ideas with respect to possible novel risk assessment applications to chemical mixtures.
在处理环境或职业暴露对健康的影响时,例如危险废物场地的地下水污染或与之相关的修复工作,我们显然面对的不是单一的化学物质。因此,我们立即面临以下问题:(1)单一化学物质风险评估方法是否适用于危险废物场地中的多种化学物质?(2)我们如何处理化学混合物的风险评估?尽管美国环境保护局(USEPA)为制定化学混合物风险评估指南做出了开拓性且值得称赞的努力,但这些指南主要基于加和性概念。随着新的科学进展,风险评估方法有望得到改进和完善。在科罗拉多州立大学(CSU),我们的研究工作致力于基于生理的药代动力学/药效学(PBPK/PD)模型在化学混合物风险评估中的挑战和潜在应用。以预测毒理学为最终目标,描述了3个具体研究项目:(1)三氯乙烯(TCE)和1,1 - 二氯乙烯(1,1 - DCE)之间毒理学相互作用的PBPK/PD模型以及“相互作用阈值”的研究和定义;(2)开蓬和四氯化碳(CCl4)之间毒理学相互作用的PBPK/PD模型以及用于预测急性毒性的蒙特卡罗模拟的耦合;(3)由7种地下水污染物的化学混合物低剂量重复给药引起的TCE药代动力学和酶动力学抑制的PBPK模型。由于本文旨在作为一篇评论,重点是处理化学混合物的方法,因此避免详细呈现数据。这些例子部分说明了我们正在进行的研究活动以及关于化学混合物可能的新型风险评估应用的相关想法。