Fox-Rushby J A
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
World Health Stat Q. 1995;48(1):23-7.
A relatively small body of knowledge has been generated in the past to identify the cost-effectiveness of mobile versus static clinics, or combinations thereof. The changes introduced by the new mobile maternal health care service offered an opportunity to address the issue of cost-effectiveness of changes introduced to a specific geographical area. Considerably higher total costs were incurred, particularly as a result of increased training and staffing. However, evidence (Foord, 1993) has shown that several key measures of process eg. number of haemoglobin tests taken and haemoglobin levels increased significantly. Therefore the extra expenditure created clear service improvements. Linking such changes to reductions in mortality was more difficult as the population size and rarity of maternal deaths made it difficult to show statistically significant differences. The results should only provide part of the information required by decision makers, for a number of reasons. First, this cost-effectiveness analysis provided no information regarding any form of equity. Secondly, many factors affect cost-effectiveness ratios and further investigation of the organisation and management of the mobile service may highlight further room for improvement within the service itself, thus improving the efficiency. In this case there were grounds for re-assessing costs in relation to training, undertaking an assessment of staffing needs and increasing accountability in the use of resources. This study gives detailed information on the structure of costs for a mobile unit. It is unusual in its consideration of how a mobile team fits into the structure of existing health services and implications of provision on other levels of service.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
过去,关于确定移动诊所与固定诊所或两者结合的成本效益,所产生的知识相对较少。新推出的移动孕产妇保健服务所带来的变化,为解决特定地理区域引入的变化的成本效益问题提供了契机。产生了相当高的总成本,尤其是培训和人员配备增加的结果。然而,有证据(福特,1993年)表明,一些关键的过程指标,如血红蛋白检测次数和血红蛋白水平显著提高。因此,额外的支出带来了明显的服务改善。由于人口规模和孕产妇死亡的罕见性,将这些变化与死亡率降低联系起来更加困难,难以显示出统计学上的显著差异。由于多种原因,这些结果仅应提供决策者所需信息的一部分。首先,这种成本效益分析没有提供任何关于公平性的信息。其次,许多因素影响成本效益比率,对移动服务的组织和管理进行进一步调查可能会凸显服务本身进一步改进的空间,从而提高效率。在这种情况下,有理由重新评估培训成本,评估人员需求,并提高资源使用的问责制。本研究提供了移动单位成本结构的详细信息。它在考虑移动团队如何融入现有卫生服务结构以及对其他服务层面的影响方面具有独特性。(摘要截取自250字)