• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Evaluation of a training program for moderators of panel doctor quality circles: a progress assessment].

作者信息

Szecsenyi J, Andres E, Bahrs O, Gerlach F M, Weiss-Plumeyer M

机构信息

Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Universität Göttingen.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):419-23.

PMID:7571746
Abstract

We report about the first 7 seminars of a training programme for presenters of quality circles for panel doctors. The seminars aim to train techniques of moderating a group and to give a methodological background for the work with quality circles. 65 (44.2%) of the 147 participants were general practitioners, 34 (23.1%) were internists and 32 (21.8%) were specialists of other disciplines. 16 (10.9%) were not physicians or not working as a physician. An evaluation of the seminars by a structured questionnaire showed mean ratings of 2.1 for lectures [in terms of school-marks from 1 (very good) to 6 (very poor)] and 1.8 for the work in small groups. Working atmosphere and opportunities for active participation were rated most positively. 6 months after the course, 64.9% of the participants already had arranged dates for meetings or had started with own quality circles.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of a training program for moderators of panel doctor quality circles: a progress assessment].
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):419-23.
2
[Implementation and evaluation of quality circles in general practice].[全科医疗中质量改进小组的实施与评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):402-5.
3
[Goal analysis of participants and moderators of general practice quality circles].[全科医疗质量改进小组参与者和协调者的目标分析]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Aug;90(5):454-8.
4
[Structured public health quality circle on the topic of diabetes management in general practice].[以全科医疗中糖尿病管理为主题的结构化公共卫生质量改进小组]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):415-8.
5
[The general practice course catalog--an attempt at quality assurance in graduate general practice education].[全科医学实践课程目录——研究生全科医学教育质量保证的一次尝试]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):340-5.
6
[Goals, content and evaluation of training seminars for quality circle moderators].[质量圈主持人培训研讨会的目标、内容与评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Aug;90(5):394-9.
7
[General practice continuing education--initial experiences with problem-based learning in a continuing education program].
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):355-8.
8
[Case-oriented work in the quality circle].质量圈中的案例导向工作
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):397-401.
9
[Conception, implementation and evaluation of the new general medicine continuing education curriculum in Südbaden].[德国巴登-符腾堡州新的普通医学继续教育课程的构思、实施与评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Aug;90(5):400-5.
10
[Concept and outcome of general practice quality circles on the topic of diabetes mellitus].[关于糖尿病主题的全科医疗质量改进小组的概念与成果]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Aug;90(5):428-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-randomization decisions and group stratification in a randomized controlled trial to improve prescribing.一项旨在改善处方开具情况的随机对照试验中的随机化前决策与组分层
Pharm World Sci. 2004 Aug;26(4):227-31. doi: 10.1023/b:phar.0000035888.60709.43.
2
Reducing prescribing of highly anticholinergic antidepressants for elderly people: randomised trial of group versus individual academic detailing.减少老年人高抗胆碱能性抗抑郁药的处方:小组与个体学术详述的随机试验
BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):654-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.654.