Franken P, Tobler I, Borbély A A
Institute of Pharmacology, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Am J Physiol. 1995 Sep;269(3 Pt 2):R691-701. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1995.269.3.R691.
To assess the influence of the photoperiod on sleep regulation, laboratory rats were adapted to a long photoperiod (LPP; 16:8-h light-dark cycle, LD 16:8) or a short photoperiod (SPP; LD 8:16). The electroencephalogram (EEG) and cortical temperature (TCRT) were continuously recorded for a baseline day, a 24-h sleep deprivation (SD) period, and a recovery day. Data obtained previously for LD 12:12 served for comparison. Whereas the photoperiod exerted a prominent effect on the 24-h sleep pattern, the 24-h baseline level of sleep and the response to SD were little affected. Recovery from SD was characterized by a marked rise in rapid eye movement sleep, a moderate rise in non-rapid eye movement sleep, and an initial enhancement of EEG slow-wave activity followed by a decrease below baseline. The amplitude and phase of the "unmasked" 24-h component of TCRT did not differ between LPP and SPP. Computer simulations demonstrated that the changes of TCRT and EEG slow-wave activity can be largely accounted for by the sequence of the vigilance states. We conclude that the photoperiod does not affect the basic processes underlying sleep regulation.
为评估光周期对睡眠调节的影响,将实验大鼠分别适应长光周期(LPP;16:8小时明暗循环,LD 16:8)或短光周期(SPP;LD 8:16)。在基线日、24小时睡眠剥夺(SD)期和恢复日连续记录脑电图(EEG)和皮层温度(TCRT)。先前在LD 12:12条件下获得的数据用于比较。尽管光周期对24小时睡眠模式有显著影响,但24小时睡眠基线水平和对睡眠剥夺的反应受影响较小。睡眠剥夺后的恢复表现为快速眼动睡眠显著增加、非快速眼动睡眠适度增加,脑电图慢波活动最初增强,随后降至基线以下。LPP和SPP之间TCRT的“未掩盖”24小时成分的幅度和相位没有差异。计算机模拟表明,TCRT和脑电图慢波活动的变化在很大程度上可由警觉状态序列来解释。我们得出结论,光周期不影响睡眠调节的基本过程。