Melnick G A, Zwanziger J
RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1995 Oct;85(10):1391-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.10.1391.
This paper examines health expenditure growth under two alternative policy approaches: competition-based managed care and state government rate regulation.
Data are presented on cumulative growth in real per capita health expenditures between 1980 and 1991 so as to compare California, a state with a pro-competitive policy, with the US average and with four states with established regulation programs.
Real per capita expenditures for hospital services in the United States grew 54% between 1980 and 1991, while in California the growth was half the national rate, or 27%. Real per capita expenditures for physician services and drug expenditures in the United States grew by 82% and 65%, respectively, while in California these expenditures increased only 58% and 41%, respectively. California's growth rate was below that of all four regulatory states for all measures of health care cost inflation.
On the basis of these findings, a properly structured competitive approach could play a significant role in controlling health expenditures in the United States.
本文研究了两种不同政策方法下的医疗支出增长情况:基于竞争的管理式医疗和州政府费率监管。
给出了1980年至1991年间实际人均医疗支出的累积增长数据,以便将实行支持竞争政策的加利福尼亚州与美国平均水平以及四个设有既定监管项目的州进行比较。
1980年至1991年间,美国医院服务的实际人均支出增长了54%,而在加利福尼亚州,该增长率仅为全国水平的一半,即27%。美国医生服务和药品支出的实际人均支出分别增长了82%和65%,而在加利福尼亚州,这些支出仅分别增长了58%和41%。在所有医疗成本通胀指标方面,加利福尼亚州的增长率均低于所有四个实行监管的州。
基于这些研究结果,合理构建的竞争方法在美国控制医疗支出方面可发挥重要作用。