• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将患者护理评估作为继续医学教育设计的指南:海洋省份的十年经验

Patient care appraisal as a guide for the design of continuing medical education: 10 years' experience in the Maritime provinces.

作者信息

Clark M R, MacIntyre K A

出版信息

Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Jan 21;118(2):131-8.

PMID:757380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1880367/
Abstract

Patient care appraisal is a process whereby physicians set down criteria and standards of patient care, prepare a summary of relevant health care activities derived from medical records and other sources of data, analyse the shortcomings discovered and design remedial programs. An attempt was made to introduce such a peer review system to 19 community hospitals in the Maritime provinces as a mechanism to improve the quality of health care. Maximum use was made of all existing quality assurance methods, complemented by innovations compatible with known educational and psychological principles. The staffs of the hospitals were willing to participate but problems were encountered in maintaining their motivation. Much of the success was related to the appropriate use of interested and competent medical record librarians in the retrieval, compilation and display of information. A positive attitude towards peer reviews and peer learning evolved in the participants. It is recommended that practising physicians, health care institutions and university divisions of continuing medical education continue and extend such cooperation and find new ways to apply the peer review mechanisms.

摘要

患者护理评估是一个过程,在此过程中医生制定患者护理的标准和规范,整理从病历及其他数据来源得出的相关医疗活动总结,分析发现的不足之处并设计补救方案。有人试图在沿海省份的19家社区医院引入这样一个同行评审系统,作为提高医疗质量的一种机制。充分利用了所有现有的质量保证方法,并辅以符合已知教育和心理原则的创新方法。医院工作人员愿意参与,但在维持他们的积极性方面遇到了问题。成功很大程度上与在信息检索、汇编和展示中恰当地利用感兴趣且称职的病历管理员有关。参与者对同行评审和同行学习形成了积极的态度。建议执业医生、医疗机构和大学继续医学教育部门继续并扩大这种合作,并找到应用同行评审机制的新方法。

相似文献

1
Patient care appraisal as a guide for the design of continuing medical education: 10 years' experience in the Maritime provinces.将患者护理评估作为继续医学教育设计的指南:海洋省份的十年经验
Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Jan 21;118(2):131-8.
2
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
3
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
4
The prevalence and special educational requirements of dyscompetent physicians.能力不足的医生的患病率及特殊教育需求。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Summer;26(3):173-91. doi: 10.1002/chp.68.
5
A survey of medical quality assurance programs in Ontario hospitals.安大略省医院医疗质量保证项目调查。
CMAJ. 1992 Jan 15;146(2):153-60.
6
Continuing medical education, quality improvement, and organizational change: implications of recent theories for twenty-first-century CME.继续医学教育、质量改进与组织变革:近期理论对21世纪继续医学教育的启示
Med Teach. 2005 May;27(3):259-68. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046270.
7
Does continuing medical education by peer review really work?同行评审式的继续医学教育真的有效吗?
Can Med Assoc J. 1973 May 19;108(10):1279-81.
8
Evaluating the effectiveness of 2 educational interventions in family practice.评估两种教育干预措施在家庭医疗中的效果。
CMAJ. 1999 Oct 19;161(8):965-70.
9
Continuing medical education in Maritime Canada: the methods physicians use, would prefer and find most effective.加拿大海事地区的继续医学教育:医生使用的、更喜欢的以及认为最有效的方法。
Can Med Assoc J. 1981 Mar 1;124(5):563-6.
10
Influence of remedial professional development programs for poorly performing physicians.针对表现不佳医生的补救性专业发展计划的影响。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007 Winter;27(1):42-8. doi: 10.1002/chp.93.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient care appraisal as a method of continuing education.患者评估作为继续教育的一种方法。
Can Fam Physician. 1982 Dec;28:2223-6.
2
Aspects of audit. 5: Looking forward to audit.审计的各个方面。5:展望审计。
Br Med J. 1980 Jun 21;280(6230):1509-11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6230.1509.
3
Aspects of audit. 4: Acceptability of audit.审计的各个方面。4:审计的可接受性。
Br Med J. 1980 Jun 14;280(6229):1443-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6229.1443.
4
Medical audit: a rose by any other name.医学审计:换个名字还是玫瑰。
Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Jun 9;120(11):1325-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of health record practitioners in the quality assurance process.健康记录从业者在质量保证过程中的作用。
Med Rec News. 1975 Apr;46(2):30-40.
2
Priorities in patient-care research and continuing medical education.
JAMA. 1968 Apr 22;204(4):303-8.
3
The medical audit study--a tool for quality control.
Hosp Prog. 1973 Feb;54(2):82-8.
4
H.M.R.I. (Hospital Medical Record Institute)? P.A.S. (Professional Activity Study)? A comparison and evaluation of two automated systems.
Dimens Health Serv. 1974 Jul;51(7):58-64.
5
Health accounting: an outcome-based system of quality assurance: illustrative application to hypertension.健康核算:一种基于结果的质量保证体系:高血压的示例应用
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1975 Jun;51(6):727-38.
6
Improved outcomes in hypertension after physician tutorials. A controlled trial.医生培训后高血压治疗效果改善。一项对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1976 Jun;84(6):646-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-84-6-646.