Lindgren L, Koivusalo A M, Kellokumpu I
Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
Br J Anaesth. 1995 Nov;75(5):567-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.5.567.
We have compared, in a randomized study, conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with abdominal wall lift in 25 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) (11 (SD 2) mm Hg vs 2.7 (9) mm Hg) (P < 0.01) and total amount of carbon dioxide used (40 (23) litre vs 9 (7) litre) (P < 0.001) were significantly less with abdominal wall lift. Pulmonary compliance was significantly greater (P < 0.01) in the abdominal wall lift group throughout operation. During the first 15 min of insufflation, arterial pressures were lower with abdominal wall lift (P < 0.05). In the conventional pneumoperitoneum group, femoral vein pressure increased (P < 0.01) and remained elevated for 3 h in the recovery room. Postoperative drowsiness was of significantly longer duration in the conventional pneumoperitoneum group than in the abdominal wall lift group (98 (46) min vs 13 (34) min) (P < 0.01). Postoperative nausea and vomiting and right shoulder pain occurred more often in patients with conventional pneumoperitoneum (P < 0.05). We conclude that the benefits of abdominal wall lift may be attributed to avoiding excessive carbon dioxide and high IAP.
在一项随机研究中,我们对25例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,比较了传统二氧化碳气腹与腹壁提升两种方法。腹壁提升组的腹内压(IAP)(11(标准差2)mmHg对2.7(9)mmHg)(P<0.01)和二氧化碳总用量(40(23)升对9(7)升)(P<0.001)显著更低。在整个手术过程中,腹壁提升组的肺顺应性显著更高(P<0.01)。在充气的前15分钟,腹壁提升组的动脉压更低(P<0.05)。在传统气腹组,股静脉压升高(P<0.01),并在恢复室中持续升高3小时。传统气腹组术后嗜睡持续时间显著长于腹壁提升组(98(46)分钟对13(34)分钟)(P<0.01)。传统气腹患者术后恶心呕吐和右肩痛更常见(P<0.05)。我们得出结论,腹壁提升的益处可能归因于避免了过多的二氧化碳和高腹内压。