Kemner C, Verbaten M N, Cuperus J M, Camfferman G, van Engeland H
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Aug 1;38(3):150-65. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)00247-Z.
ERPs to auditory stimuli, generated during an oddball task, were obtained in a group of autistic children and three control groups (normal, ADDH, and dyslectic children, respectively). The task included the presentation of standards, deviants, and novels and had a (between-group) passive vs. active (counting) condition. It was examined whether 1) it was possible to replicate several earlier findings, 2) autistics manifest an abnormal lateralization pattern of ERPs, 3) autistics have an abnormal mismatch negativity (MMN), and 4) differences between autistics and normals are really specific to the autistic group. The only finding that could be replicated was that autistics have a smaller A/Pcz/300. There was no evidence for abnormal lateralization or abnormal MMN; however, there was an unexpected effect of the task manipulation on the amplitude of the P3: in autistics, the occipital P3 to deviant stimuli was significantly larger in the active than in the passive condition, a finding, like the replication of the smaller A/Pcz/300, specific to the autistic group. It was suggested that the auditory occipital task effect is related to understimulation of the occipital lobe by visual stimuli in autistic children.
在一项异常刺激任务中,对一组自闭症儿童和三个对照组(分别为正常儿童、注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童和诵读困难儿童)进行了听觉刺激引发的事件相关电位(ERP)测试。该任务包括呈现标准刺激、偏差刺激和新异刺激,且存在(组间)被动与主动(计数)两种条件。研究考察了以下几点:1)是否有可能重复先前的若干研究结果;2)自闭症患者是否表现出异常的ERP偏侧化模式;3)自闭症患者是否存在异常的失匹配负波(MMN);4)自闭症患者与正常儿童之间的差异是否真的是自闭症群体所特有的。唯一能够重复的发现是自闭症患者的A/Pcz/300较小。没有证据表明存在异常偏侧化或异常MMN;然而,任务操作对P3波幅产生了意外影响:在自闭症患者中,主动条件下枕叶对偏差刺激的P3波幅显著大于被动条件下的,这一发现与较小的A/Pcz/300的重复结果一样,是自闭症群体所特有的。研究表明,听觉枕叶任务效应与自闭症儿童视觉刺激对枕叶的刺激不足有关。