• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬表面载体试验作为消毒的定量检测:一项合作研究。

Hard surface carrier test as a quantitative test of disinfection: a collaborative study.

作者信息

Hamilton M A, DeVries T A, Rubino J R

机构信息

Montana State University, Bozeman 59717, USA.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 1995 Jul-Aug;78(4):1102-9.

PMID:7580324
Abstract

The hard surface carrier test (HSCT) recently was proposed as a qualitative test for disinfectant efficacy. A collaborative study of HSCT led to a suggested performance standard of < or = 2 or 3 positive carriers out of 60 tested. Subsequently, it was discovered that HSCT can be used as a quantitative test, because the HSCT protocol requires measurement of inoculum level on some carriers. The data allow estimation of the log10 reduction in number of active bacteria. Producers, consumers, and policymakers will be better able to discuss merits of alternative performance standards if the focus is on log reduction of organisms rather than on number of positive carriers. Data from the collaborative study were reanalyzed from this quantitative viewpoint. If the point estimate of log reduction in LR and the 99% lower confidence limit estimate is LLR, the LR values ranged from 7.0 to 9.0 and the LLR values were greater than 6.0 for all disinfectants except the negative control formulation. The total variance for estimated LR is the sum of interlaboratory and intralaboratory variances. The total variance for LR was 0.095 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 0.251 for Staphylococcus aureus, and 0.118 for Salmonella choleraesuis. Percentages of the variance due to interlaboratory variability were 11% for P. aeruginosa, 52% for S. aureus, and 25% for S. choleraesuis. Chances of making false-effective and false-ineffective decisions can be calculated for the quantitative HSCT. The performance standard can be based on LLR.

摘要

硬表面载体试验(HSCT)最近被提议作为一种消毒剂效力的定性试验。一项关于HSCT的协作研究得出了一个建议的性能标准,即在60个测试载体中阳性载体≤2个或3个。随后,发现HSCT可作为定量试验,因为HSCT方案要求测量一些载体上的接种物水平。这些数据可用于估计活性细菌数量的对数减少量。如果重点是生物体的对数减少而不是阳性载体的数量,生产商、消费者和政策制定者将能够更好地讨论替代性能标准的优点。从这个定量角度对协作研究的数据进行了重新分析。如果对数减少量(LR)的点估计值和99%的下限置信极限估计值是LLR,除阴性对照制剂外,所有消毒剂的LR值范围为7.0至9.0,LLR值大于6.0。估计LR的总方差是实验室间方差和实验室内方差之和。铜绿假单胞菌的LR总方差为0.095,金黄色葡萄球菌为0.251,猪霍乱沙门氏菌为0.118。实验室间变异性导致的方差百分比,铜绿假单胞菌为11%,金黄色葡萄球菌为52%,猪霍乱沙门氏菌为25%。对于定量HSCT,可以计算做出假有效和假无效决策的概率。性能标准可以基于LLR。

相似文献

1
Hard surface carrier test as a quantitative test of disinfection: a collaborative study.硬表面载体试验作为消毒的定量检测:一项合作研究。
J AOAC Int. 1995 Jul-Aug;78(4):1102-9.
2
Interlaboratory evaluations of a standardized quantitative test method for determining the bactericidal and tuberculocidal efficacy of antimicrobial substances on hard non-porous surfaces.用于确定抗菌物质在坚硬无孔表面上的杀菌和杀结核杆菌效力的标准化定量测试方法的实验室间评估。
J Microbiol Methods. 2022 May;196:106460. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2022.106460. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Performance of the AOAC use-dilution method with targeted modifications: collaborative study.AOAC使用稀释法的性能及针对性修改:协作研究
J AOAC Int. 2012 Nov-Dec;95(6):1618-28. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.12-170.
4
Disinfectant testing using a modified use-dilution method: collaborative study.采用改良使用稀释法进行消毒剂测试:协作研究
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Nov-Dec;71(6):1187-94.
5
Antimicrobial efficacy and compatibility of solid copper alloys with chemical disinfectants.固体铜合金与化学消毒剂的抗菌效果和相容性。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0200748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200748. eCollection 2018.
6
Determining the efficacy of liquid sporicides against spores of Bacillus subtilis on a hard nonporous surface using the quantitative three step method: collaborative study.采用定量三步法测定液体杀孢子剂对坚硬无孔表面上枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的杀灭效果:协作研究
J AOAC Int. 2008 Jul-Aug;91(4):833-52.
7
Quantitative analysis of a presence/absence microbiological assay: the hard surface carrier test of disinfectant efficacy.微生物存在/不存在检测的定量分析:消毒剂效力的硬表面载体试验
Biometrics. 1996 Sep;52(3):1112-20.
8
[Microbiological evaluation of chemical disinfectants for household use].[家用化学消毒剂的微生物学评价]
Rev Saude Publica. 1990 Feb;24(1):47-50. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89101990000100008.
9
[Quantitative recovery of bacteria from different germ carrier materials].
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1990 May;190(1-2):141-53.
10
Standardization of bacterial numbers of penicylinders used in disinfectant testing: interlaboratory study.用于消毒剂测试的青霉素瓶细菌数量标准化:实验室间研究
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1987 Jul-Aug;70(4):635-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of disinfectants and manual wiping for processing the cell product changeover in a biosafety cabinet.消毒剂和人工擦拭对生物安全柜中细胞产品转换处理的影响。
Regen Ther. 2023 Feb 9;22:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.01.009. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Reproducibility of antimicrobial test methods.抗菌测试方法的重现性。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30282-3.