改进口腔检查：为全科医学研究生考试选拔、培训和监督考官。皇家全科医师学院。
Improving oral examinations: selecting, training, and monitoring examiners for the MRCGP. Royal College of General Practitioners.
作者信息
Wakeford R, Southgate L, Wass V
机构信息
Old Schools, Cambridge University.
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Oct 7;311(7010):931-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7010.931.
Abstract
Unless examiners are carefully selected, trained, and monitored, examinations may become haphazard. This is perhaps most true of oral or viva voce ("viva") examinations, which can generate marks unrelated to competence. To help other bodies to short circuit some years of experiment in connection with the oral component of the Royal College of General Practitioners' membership examination (MRCGP), this paper describes the selection, training, guidance, and monitoring arrangements that have been developed.
摘要
除非仔细挑选、培训和监督考官，考试可能会变得随意。对于口试或口头答辩（“答辩”）考试来说可能更是如此，这类考试可能会给出与能力无关的分数。为了帮助其他机构避免在皇家全科医师学院会员考试（MRCGP）口试部分进行多年的试验，本文介绍了已制定的选拔、培训、指导和监督安排。
相似文献
1
Improving oral examinations: selecting, training, and monitoring examiners for the MRCGP. Royal College of General Practitioners.改进口腔检查：为全科医学研究生考试选拔、培训和监督考官。皇家全科医师学院。
BMJ. 1995 Oct 7;311(7010):931-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7010.931.
2
What is being assessed in the MRCGP oral examination? A qualitative study.在全科医学研究生入学考试口试中评估的是什么？一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jun;55(515):430-6.
3
Postgraduate examinations for general practice in Canada and the United Kingdom.加拿大和英国的全科医学研究生考试。
Lancet. 1979 Jul 7;2(8132):28-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)90187-9.
4
MRCGP pass rate by medical school and region of postgraduate training. Royal College of General Practitioners.按医学院校和研究生培训地区划分的MRCGP及格率。皇家全科医师学院。
BMJ. 1993 Aug 28;307(6903):542-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6903.542-a.
5
Ensuring reliability in UK written tests of general practice: the MRCGP examination 1998-2003.确保英国全科医学笔试的可靠性：1998 - 2003年的全科医学研究生入学考试（MRCGP）
Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):37-45. doi: 10.1080/01421590400013461.
6
Quality assurance of the Applied Knowledge Test (AKT) of the MRCGP examination - an immediate post-test questionnaire evaluation of the candidates' views.英国皇家全科医师考试应用知识测试（AKT）的质量保证——对考生观点的考后即时问卷调查评估
Educ Prim Care. 2015 Jul;26(4):223-32. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2015.11494346.
7
Patient centredness in the MRCGP video examination: analysis of large cohort. Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners.MRCGP视频考试中的以患者为中心：大型队列分析。皇家全科医师学院成员。
BMJ. 2002 Sep 28;325(7366):691-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.691.
8
Performance and views of examiners in the Applied Knowledge Test for the nMRCGP licensing examination.nMRCGP 执照考试应用知识测试中考官的表现与观点
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Feb;59(559):e38-43. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X395111.
9
What's wrong with the traditional viva as a method of assessment in orthodontic education?作为正畸教育中的一种评估方法，传统的口试存在什么问题？
J Orthod. 2010 Jun;37(2):128-33. doi: 10.1179/14653121042993.
10
The MRCGP examination.
Practitioner. 1989 Apr 22;233(1467):584-5.
引用本文的文献
1
What do international health electives and state examination scores have in common? - A cohort study to compare the results of written medical licensing examinations with the participation in international health electives during the final year of undergraduate medical education in Germany.国际健康选修课程与国家考试成绩有何共同之处？——一项队列研究，旨在比较德国本科医学教育最后一年参加国际健康选修课程的学生与参加医学执照笔试的学生的成绩。
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 Nov 30;35(5):Doc54. doi: 10.3205/zma001200. eCollection 2018.
2
Three years of experience with a workshop for medical specialty examiners in South Baden: A project report and initial evaluation results.南巴登医学专业考官研讨会三年经验：项目报告及初步评估结果
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;34(5):Doc55. doi: 10.3205/zma001132. eCollection 2017.
3
Peer feedback for examiner quality assurance on MRCGP International South Asia: a mixed methods study.MRCGP 国际南亚考试官质量保证的同行反馈：混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1090-1.
4
Factors associated with success in the oral part of the European Diploma in Intensive Care.与欧洲重症监护文凭口试成功相关的因素。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2017 Nov;18(4):294-299. doi: 10.1177/1751143717712623. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
5
Visions and reality: the idea of competence-oriented assessment for German medical students is not yet realised in licensing examinations.愿景与现实：德国医学生以能力为导向的评估理念在执照考试中尚未实现。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 May 15;34(2):Doc25. doi: 10.3205/zma001102. eCollection 2017.
6
A Case for Caution: Chart-Stimulated Recall.需谨慎对待的一个案例：图表激发式回忆
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):531-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00011.1.
7
Impact of the Medical Faculty on Study Success in Freiburg: Results from Graduate Surveys.弗莱堡医学院对学业成功的影响：毕业生调查结果
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Oct 15;32(4):Doc44. doi: 10.3205/zma000986. eCollection 2015.
8
The Final Oral/Practical State Examination at Freiburg Medical Faculty in 2012--Analysis of grading to test quality assurance.2012年弗莱堡医学院的期末口试/实践技能国家考试——评分分析以检验质量保证
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Oct 15;32(4):Doc39. doi: 10.3205/zma000981. eCollection 2015.
9
Viva voce in postgraduate surgical examinations in anglophone west Africa.在西非英语地区的研究生外科考试中的口试。
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2011 Jan;1(1):40-52.
10
Introduction of Structured Oral Examination as A Novel Assessment tool to First Year Medical Students in Physiology.将结构化口试作为一种新型评估工具引入生理学专业一年级医学生的教学中。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Nov;7(11):2544-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/7350.3606. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
本文引用的文献
1
Correcting performance-rating errors in oral examinations.纠正口试中的成绩评定错误。
Eval Health Prof. 1991 Mar;14(1):100-22. doi: 10.1177/016327879101400107.
2
The oral examination: a study of academic and non-academic factors.口腔检查：一项关于学术因素和非学术因素的研究。
Med Educ. 1993 Sep;27(5):433-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00297.x.
3
The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinations.
Med Educ. 1980 Sep;14(5):345-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1980.tb02379.x.
4
Short answer questions in an undergraduate qualifying examination: a study of examiner variability.本科资格考试中的简答题：考官变异性研究
Med Educ. 1984 May;18(3):168-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb00999.x.
5
Interviews in the selection of partners, trainees and medical students.在挑选合作伙伴、实习生和医科学生时进行面试。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Apr;38(309):147-8.
Zotero 插件