Ferraz M B, Walter S D, Heymann R, Atra E
Division of Rheumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Oct;34(10):932-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/34.10.932.
In this study, we estimated the sensitivity and specificity of different criteria (International, Japanese, Mason & Barnes, O'Duffy, James and clinical judgement) for Behçet's Disease using the latent class approach. Thirty-two consecutive Behçet's Disease patients who were initially diagnosed according to clinical judgement, and 56 control patients with other rheumatic diseases, were recruited from the rheumatology out-patient clinic. The patients had their charts reviewed, were interviewed and clinically examined. Various models including different combinations of the six diagnostic criteria were tested. In the model that included all the information gathered, the International (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 1.00), Japanese (sensitivity = 1.00, specificity - 0.95) and Mason & Barnes criteria (sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.94) were the most accurate. Clinician judgement also performed very well in identifying a Behçet's Disease case (sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.85). The International, Japanese and Mason & Barnes criteria were the most accurate. The latent class method led to these conclusions without making any initial assumptions about the accuracy of any of the competing criteria (including clinical judgement).
在本研究中,我们使用潜在类别方法估计了不同标准(国际标准、日本标准、梅森与巴恩斯标准、奥达菲标准、詹姆斯标准和临床判断)对白塞病的敏感性和特异性。从风湿病门诊招募了32例最初根据临床判断确诊的白塞病患者以及56例患有其他风湿性疾病的对照患者。对这些患者的病历进行了复查,进行了访谈并进行了临床检查。测试了包括六种诊断标准不同组合的各种模型。在包含所有收集到的信息的模型中,国际标准(敏感性 = 0.95,特异性 = 1.00)、日本标准(敏感性 = 1.00,特异性 = 0.95)和梅森与巴恩斯标准(敏感性 = 1.00,特异性 = 0.94)最为准确。临床医生的判断在识别白塞病病例方面也表现出色(敏感性 = 1.00,特异性 = 0.85)。国际标准、日本标准和梅森与巴恩斯标准最为准确。潜在类别方法得出了这些结论,而没有对任何竞争标准(包括临床判断)的准确性做出任何初始假设。