Suh D, Chaires J B
Department of Biochemistry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216-4505, USA.
Bioorg Med Chem. 1995 Jun;3(6):723-8. doi: 10.1016/0968-0896(95)00053-j.
A complete characterization of DNA binding agents requires that their mode of binding to DNA be established. In the absence of high resolution structural data, the mode of binding is, of necessity, usually inferred indirectly from various solution studies. The purpose of this study is to show that only certain methods can be used reliably to infer the DNA binding mode. Comparative fluorescence and hydrodynamic studies using the proven intercalator ethidium and the groove binder Hoechst 33258 are described. The results of our studies show that while fluorescence intensity, polarization, and quenching measurements can detect a binding interaction of the ligand with DNA, none are sensitive indicators of the binding mode. Fluorescence contact energy transfer studies can reliably indicate intercalation, as can viscosity measurements. Our results illustrate reliable criteria that may be used to distinguish intercalation from groove binding in the absence of high resolution structural data.
对DNA结合剂的完整表征需要确定其与DNA的结合模式。在缺乏高分辨率结构数据的情况下,结合模式通常必然是从各种溶液研究中间接推断出来的。本研究的目的是表明只有某些方法可以可靠地用于推断DNA结合模式。描述了使用已证实的嵌入剂溴化乙锭和平沟结合剂Hoechst 33258进行的比较荧光和流体动力学研究。我们的研究结果表明,虽然荧光强度、偏振和猝灭测量可以检测配体与DNA的结合相互作用,但没有一个是结合模式的敏感指标。荧光接触能量转移研究可以可靠地表明嵌入,粘度测量也可以。我们的结果说明了在缺乏高分辨率结构数据的情况下可用于区分嵌入与平沟结合的可靠标准。