• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性多发伤患者闭合性及轻度开放性胫骨骨折的非扩髓髓内钉固定术

Nonreamed nailing of closed and minor open tibial fractures in patients with blunt polytrauma.

作者信息

Riemer B L, Miranda M A, Butterfield S L, Burke C J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Nov(320):119-24.

PMID:7586814
Abstract

A retrospective comparison of dynamic and static locking mode nonreamed nails in 88 closed, Grades I and II open tibial fractures is presented. Amount of time and number of reoperations required to unite fractures were compared for dynamic (Group 1, n = 31) and static locked (Group 2, n = 13) Winquist I and II fractures, and dynamic (Group 3, n = 14) and static locked (Group 4, n = 30) Winquist III, IV, and segmental fractures. Total reoperations also were compared; Tibias treated with dynamic nails united in an average of 20 weeks, with 3 reoperations; tibias treated with static locked nails united in an average of 30 weeks, with 21 reoperations. Group 1 fractures united in an average of 20 weeks, with 1 reoperation; Group 2 fractures united in an average of 32 weeks, with 4 reoperations. Group 3 fractures united in an average of 20 weeks; Group 4 fractures united in an average of 29 weeks, with 11 reoperations. In the group of tibias treated with dynamic nails, 3 additional operations were done; in the group of tibias treated with static locked nails, 7 additional operations were done. There was 1 infection and 3 deformities. Static locking mode appeared to delay union, especially when Groups 1 and 2 are compared; these fractures can be nailed without locking screws.

摘要

本文对88例闭合性、I级和II级开放性胫骨骨折采用动力型和静力型锁定髓内钉进行回顾性比较。比较了动力型(第1组,n = 31)和静力锁定型(第2组,n = 13)Winquist I级和II级骨折以及动力型(第3组,n = 14)和静力锁定型(第4组,n = 30)Winquist III级、IV级和节段性骨折愈合所需的时间和再次手术次数。还比较了总的再次手术情况;采用动力型髓内钉治疗的胫骨平均20周愈合,需再次手术3次;采用静力锁定型髓内钉治疗的胫骨平均30周愈合,需再次手术21次。第1组骨折平均20周愈合,需再次手术1次;第2组骨折平均32周愈合,需再次手术4次。第3组骨折平均20周愈合;第4组骨折平均29周愈合,需再次手术11次。在采用动力型髓内钉治疗的胫骨组中,额外进行了3次手术;在采用静力锁定型髓内钉治疗的胫骨组中,额外进行了7次手术。发生1例感染和3例畸形。静力锁定模式似乎延迟了骨折愈合,尤其是比较第1组和第2组时;这些骨折可以不使用锁定螺钉进行髓内钉固定。

相似文献

1
Nonreamed nailing of closed and minor open tibial fractures in patients with blunt polytrauma.钝性多发伤患者闭合性及轻度开放性胫骨骨折的非扩髓髓内钉固定术
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Nov(320):119-24.
2
Nonreamed nailing of tibial diaphyseal fractures in blunt polytrauma patients.
J Orthop Trauma. 1995 Feb;9(1):66-75. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199502000-00011.
3
Nonreamed flexible locked intramedullary nailing in tibial open fractures.非扩髓弹性锁定髓内钉治疗胫骨开放性骨折
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 May(350):97-104.
4
Comparative study on the effect of reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nails on treating open tibial fractures.扩髓与非扩髓髓内钉治疗开放性胫骨骨折效果的对比研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jan;20(1):23-6.
5
[Treatment of adult tibial diaphysis fractures with reamed and locked intramedullary nailing].[扩髓带锁髓内钉治疗成人胫骨干骨折]
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009 Jan-Feb;43(1):7-13. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2009.007.
6
Exchange reamed intramedullary nailing for delayed union and nonunion of the tibia.交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨延迟愈合和不愈合
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun(315):169-75.
7
Nonreamed interlocked intramedullary tibial nailing. One community's experience.非扩髓带锁髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折:一个社区的经验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun(315):104-13.
8
Nonreamed interlocking nailing of closed tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injury.严重软组织损伤的闭合性胫骨骨折的非扩髓交锁髓内钉固定术
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun(315):34-47.
9
[Borderline indications for locked intramedullary nailing of femur and tibia].[股骨和胫骨带锁髓内钉固定的临界适应症]
Orthopade. 1996 Jun;25(3):234-46.
10
The treatment of open and/or unstable tibial fractures with an unreamed double-locked tibial nail.使用非扩髓双锁定胫骨髓内钉治疗开放性和/或不稳定型胫骨骨折。
Orthop Rev. 1994 Feb;Suppl:9-17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of dynamic versus static fixation of intramedullary nailing in tibial diaphyseal fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胫骨干骨折髓内钉动态与静态固定的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jul 19;32:101941. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101941. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Outcomes of early versus delayed weight-bearing with intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.髓内钉治疗胫骨骨干骨折早期与延迟负重的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3521-3527. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01919-w. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
3
Critical analysis of tibial fracture healing following unreamed nailing.
胫骨骨折不扩髓髓内钉固定后愈合的批判性分析。
Int Orthop. 2012 Jul;36(7):1471-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1505-x. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
4
[Management strategies in the first operative phase after long-bone injury of the lower extremity in multiple-injured patients. A systematic literature review].[多发伤患者下肢长骨损伤后首个手术阶段的管理策略。一项系统文献综述]
Unfallchirurg. 2005 Oct;108(10):829-38, 840-2. doi: 10.1007/s00113-005-1012-2.