• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医疗中糖尿病患病率的变化及其与社会经济剥夺的关系。

Variation of diabetes mellitus prevalence in general practice and its relation to deprivation.

作者信息

Meadows P

机构信息

Priory Surgery, Knowle, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 1995 Aug;12(8):696-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00572.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00572.x
PMID:7587009
Abstract

This is an observational study to compare age standardized diabetes prevalences and relate these to socio-economic measures of deprivation. It includes data from eight general (family) practices in the Bristol, UK, area with no ethnic minorities affecting diabetes prevalence. A total population of 71 599 was covered, including 181 Type 1 and 901 Type 2 diabetic patients, 91 of whom were controlled with insulin, 499 with oral hypoglycaemics, and 311 with diet alone. Actual Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes prevalences were standardized to what they would be if each practice had the UK national age profile. Total standardized diabetes prevalence varied from 1.31% to 2.51% (p < 0.001) and Type 2 diabetes prevalence from 0.97% to 2.29% (p < 0.001). There was no significant variation in the prevalence of Type 1 diabetes. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient indicated a significant association between standardized diabetes prevalence and two measures, the Jarman and Townsend indices, of deprivation in the electoral ward where each practice was situated. Total standardized diabetes prevalence was significantly correlated with each of the Jarman and Townsend indices (r = 0.76, p < 0.05). Standardized Type 2 diabetes prevalence was similarly significantly correlated to each deprivation index (rs = 0.74, p < 0.05). Type 2 diabetes prevalence is affected by socio-economic factors with implications for health targets and capitation based budgets.

摘要

这是一项观察性研究,旨在比较年龄标准化的糖尿病患病率,并将其与社会经济剥夺指标相关联。该研究纳入了英国布里斯托尔地区8家普通(家庭)诊所的数据,这些诊所不存在影响糖尿病患病率的少数族裔。研究涵盖的总人口为71599人,其中包括181名1型糖尿病患者和901名2型糖尿病患者,其中91人使用胰岛素控制,499人使用口服降糖药,311人仅通过饮食控制。将实际的1型和2型糖尿病患病率按照每家诊所具有英国全国年龄分布时的情况进行标准化。总的标准化糖尿病患病率在1.31%至2.51%之间(p<0.001),2型糖尿病患病率在0.97%至2.29%之间(p<0.001)。1型糖尿病患病率无显著差异。斯皮尔曼等级相关系数表明,标准化糖尿病患病率与每家诊所所在选区的两种剥夺指标(贾曼指数和汤森指数)之间存在显著关联。总的标准化糖尿病患病率与贾曼指数和汤森指数均显著相关(r = 0.76,p<0.05)。标准化2型糖尿病患病率与各剥夺指数同样显著相关(rs = 0.74,p<0.05)。2型糖尿病患病率受社会经济因素影响,这对健康目标和基于人头费的预算具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Variation of diabetes mellitus prevalence in general practice and its relation to deprivation.全科医疗中糖尿病患病率的变化及其与社会经济剥夺的关系。
Diabet Med. 1995 Aug;12(8):696-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00572.x.
2
Socio-economic status, obesity and prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.社会经济地位、肥胖与1型和2型糖尿病的患病率
Diabet Med. 2000 Jun;17(6):478-80.
3
Influences on the variation in prevalence of type 2 diabetes between general practices: practice, patient or socioeconomic factors?全科医疗中2型糖尿病患病率差异的影响因素:医疗实践、患者因素还是社会经济因素?
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jan;53(486):9-14.
4
Health outcomes for diabetes patients returning for three annual general practice checks.糖尿病患者进行三次年度全科医疗检查后的健康状况。
N Z Med J. 2007 Apr 13;120(1252):U2493.
5
[Prevalence of diabetes, antidiabetic treatment and chronic diabetic complications reported by general practitioners].[全科医生报告的糖尿病患病率、抗糖尿病治疗及慢性糖尿病并发症情况]
Przegl Lek. 2005;62(4):201-5.
6
Evidence of an increasing prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus in the Poole area from 1983 to 1996.1983年至1996年期间,普尔地区确诊糖尿病患病率上升的证据。
Diabet Med. 1998 Dec;15(12):1015-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(1998120)15:12<1015::AID-DIA719>3.0.CO;2-K.
7
Capture-recapture-adjusted prevalence rates of type 2 diabetes are related to social deprivation.采用捕获-再捕获法调整后的2型糖尿病患病率与社会剥夺相关。
QJM. 1999 Dec;92(12):707-10. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/92.12.707.
8
The relationship between census-derived socio-economic variables and general practice consultation rates in three town centre practices.三个市中心诊所中基于人口普查得出的社会经济变量与全科医疗咨询率之间的关系。
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Oct;48(435):1675-8.
9
Relation between night visit rates and deprivation measures in one general practice.一家普通诊所的夜间就诊率与贫困程度衡量指标之间的关系。
BMJ. 1993 May 22;306(6889):1383-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6889.1383.
10
Trends in treatment among unselected geographically defined diabetic population.未经过筛选的按地理位置划分的糖尿病患者群体的治疗趋势。
Diabetes Care. 1990 May;13(5):545-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.13.5.545.

引用本文的文献

1
Neighbourhood property value and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Maastricht study: A multilevel study.邻里房产价值与 2 型糖尿病的关系:一项马斯特里赫特研究:多层次研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 8;15(6):e0234324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234324. eCollection 2020.
2
The association between socioeconomic disparities and left ventricular hypertrophy in chronic kidney disease: results from the KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease (KNOW-CKD).社会经济差异与慢性肾脏病左心室肥厚之间的关联:韩国慢性肾脏病患者结局队列研究(KNOW-CKD)的结果
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Aug 16;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1005-3.
3
Socioeconomic status and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: a systematic review.
中国大陆、香港和台湾的社会经济地位与 2 型糖尿病患病率的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):011103. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.011103.
4
Income, wealth and risk of diabetes among older adults: cohort study using the English longitudinal study of ageing.老年人的收入、财富与糖尿病风险:基于英国老龄化纵向研究的队列研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Jun;22(3):310-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr050. Epub 2011 May 12.
5
The effect of screening on the prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes in primary care.筛查对初级保健中确诊的2型糖尿病患病率的影响。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(4):232-7. doi: 10.3109/02813430903226480.
6
Inter-practice variation in diagnosing hypertension and diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in general practice.基层医疗中高血压和糖尿病诊断的实践间差异:一项全科医疗的横断面研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Jan 21;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-6.
7
Education, income, occupation, and the 34-year incidence (1965-99) of Type 2 diabetes in the Alameda County Study.阿拉米达县研究中的教育程度、收入、职业与2型糖尿病的34年发病率(1965 - 1999年)
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;34(6):1274-81. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi167. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
8
The demographic and social class basis of inequality in self reported morbidity: an exploration using the Health Survey for England.自我报告发病率不平等的人口统计学和社会阶层基础:基于英格兰健康调查的探索
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Apr;58(4):303-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2002.003475.
9
Influences on the variation in prevalence of type 2 diabetes between general practices: practice, patient or socioeconomic factors?全科医疗中2型糖尿病患病率差异的影响因素:医疗实践、患者因素还是社会经济因素?
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jan;53(486):9-14.
10
Estimation of the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes from primary care and secondary care source data: comparison of record linkage with capture-recapture analysis.根据初级保健和二级保健源数据估算已确诊糖尿病的患病率:记录链接与捕获-再捕获分析的比较
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jan;56(1):18-23. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.1.18.