• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大一家三级医疗机构中头孢噻肟每日两次给药的临床和经济结果的回顾性分析。

Retrospective analysis of the clinical and economic outcomes of twice-daily dosing of cefotaxime in a Canadian tertiary care institution.

作者信息

Tin L Y, Pitre M, Conly J M

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00091-n.

DOI:10.1016/0732-8893(95)00091-n
PMID:7587028
Abstract

A retrospective analysis of the clinical and economic outcome of a regimen of cefotaxime 1 g given every 12 h was conducted following the introduction of an institutional policy recommending this new dosing strategy. Patients were identified from a log order entry in the pharmacy, and the medical records were reviewed using a standardized data collection form. Explicit criteria were applied for the indications for antimicrobial therapy, presence of infection, and outcome parameters. A total of 60 patients with a mean (+/- SD) age of 56.2 (+/- 17.8) years and a mean (+/- SD) length of stay of 20.75 (+/- 18.1) days were identified. Of these, 48 (80%) were found to have a clinically or microbiologically documented infection, and of the 42 patients who could be assessed accordingly to the criteria chosen, 37 (88%) had a favorable clinical response; 21 patients (35%) received cefotaxime alone. The costs for administration of cefotaxime have decreased by approximately 30% since the introduction of this new dosing regimen.

摘要

在引入一项推荐新给药策略(每12小时给予1克头孢噻肟)的机构政策后,对该治疗方案的临床和经济结果进行了回顾性分析。通过药房的医嘱录入记录确定患者,并使用标准化数据收集表对病历进行审查。对抗菌治疗指征、感染存在情况和结果参数应用了明确的标准。共确定了60例患者,平均(±标准差)年龄为56.2(±17.8)岁,平均(±标准差)住院时间为20.75(±18.1)天。其中,48例(80%)被发现有临床或微生物学记录的感染,在可根据所选标准进行评估的42例患者中,37例(88%)有良好的临床反应;21例患者(35%)仅接受了头孢噻肟治疗。自引入这种新的给药方案以来,头孢噻肟的给药成本下降了约30%。

相似文献

1
Retrospective analysis of the clinical and economic outcomes of twice-daily dosing of cefotaxime in a Canadian tertiary care institution.加拿大一家三级医疗机构中头孢噻肟每日两次给药的临床和经济结果的回顾性分析。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00091-n.
2
A retrospective analysis of twice-daily cefotaxime compared to conventional therapy for the treatment of infections in a USA hospital.一项关于在美国一家医院中,每日两次使用头孢噻肟与传统疗法治疗感染的回顾性分析。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):167-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00102-g.
3
Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of cefotaxime sodium dosed twice daily. The Swedish experience.头孢噻肟钠每日两次给药疗效的回顾性分析。瑞典的经验。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00087-q.
4
Cefotaxime. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of infections.头孢噻肟。对其用于治疗感染的药物经济学综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jan;13(1 Pt 1):91-106. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813010-00009.
5
Cefotaxime twice daily versus ceftriaxone once daily. A randomized controlled study in patients with serious infections.头孢噻肟每日两次与头孢曲松每日一次的对比:一项针对严重感染患者的随机对照研究
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):155-7. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00080-t.
6
Review and reassessment of dosing schedules for cefotaxime in selected medical indications.对选定医学适应症中头孢噻肟给药方案的回顾与重新评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00103-h.
7
Study of cefotaxime twice daily for the therapy of postoperative pneumonia. The German Cefotaxime Study Group.头孢噻肟每日两次治疗术后肺炎的研究。德国头孢噻肟研究小组。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):203-7. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00082-l.
8
Prospective evaluation of twice-daily cefotaxime in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe infections.每日两次头孢噻肟治疗住院严重感染患者的前瞻性评估
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):159-61. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00084-n.
9
[Cost-effectiveness comparative study of ceftriaxone verus cefotaxime in the treatment of complicated urinary infections].头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗复杂性泌尿系统感染的成本效益比较研究
Actas Urol Esp. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(7):668-74.
10
Cost comparison of single daily i.v. doses of ceftriaxone versus continuous infusion of cefotaxime.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Jul 15;54(14):1614-8. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/54.14.1614.