Murphy C
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, USA.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1995 Nov;13(4):973-1007.
Hypertensive emergencies are uncommon and physiologically diverse. Consequently, it is difficult for most physicians to develop a familiarity with all the different hypertensive crises and with all drugs available for treating them (Table 4). Clinicians should not agonize over which is the perfect therapeutic agent for a particular emergency, but instead, they should focus on scrupulous monitoring and familiarize themselves with a few agents that will serve in most situations. Generally, these agents will be sodium nitroprusside and nitroglycerin. Vigilant neurologic monitoring is mandatory in all hypertensive emergencies. The early symptoms and signs of cerebral hypoperfusion can be vague and subtle, but if recognized, serious complications of therapy can be avoided. Remember, the patient may still be hypertensive. Avoid acute (during the first hour) reductions in MAP of more than 20% whenever possible; subsequent reductions should be gradual. In patients known to have markedly elevated ICP and who need acute reductions in their BP, serious consideration should be given to direct monitoring of the ICP so that CPP can be maintained within safe limits. In general, oral agents should not be used for the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Intravenous Labetalol and intravenous nicardipine are not suitable for general use in hypertensive emergencies. In special situations (e.g., perioperative hypertension and subarachnoid hemorrhage), however, they may be employed. Their role may expand with further study. Trimethaphan may be superior to nitroprusside for hypertension complicated by elevated ICP or cerebral dysfunction. Realistically, most physicians will continue to use nitroprusside. Intense neurologic monitoring is more important than the specific agent used. Nitroglycerin is the agent of choice for acute ischemic heart disease complicated by severe hypertension; if it fails, use nitroprusside. For aortic dissection, the combination of nitroprusside and IV propranolol is the therapy of choice; beta-blockade must be achieved rapidly or the dissection may worsen. Trimethaphan is also an agent for first-line therapy. Esmolol is an alternative to IV propranolol for the treatment of aortic dissection, if prolonged beta-blockade might seriously jeopardize the patient. For eclampsia, unless an expert in hypertension during pregnancy has established an alternative, the therapy of choice is hydralazine and magnesium. The treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage is in flux; calcium channel blockers are used to prevent spasm, not to lower BP. If the BP must be lowered immediately, use nitroprusside.
高血压急症并不常见,且生理表现多样。因此,大多数医生很难熟悉所有不同类型的高血压危象以及所有可用于治疗它们的药物(表4)。临床医生不应纠结于哪种药物是治疗特定急症的完美药物,而应专注于严格的监测,并熟悉几种在大多数情况下都适用的药物。一般来说,这些药物将是硝普钠和硝酸甘油。在所有高血压急症中,必须进行严密的神经学监测。脑灌注不足的早期症状和体征可能模糊且不明显,但如果能识别出来,就可以避免治疗的严重并发症。记住,患者可能仍处于高血压状态。尽可能避免在急性发作期(最初1小时内)使平均动脉压(MAP)降低超过20%;随后的降低应逐步进行。对于已知颅内压(ICP)明显升高且需要急性降低血压的患者,应认真考虑直接监测ICP,以便将脑灌注压(CPP)维持在安全范围内。一般来说,口服药物不应用于治疗高血压急症。静脉注射拉贝洛尔和静脉注射尼卡地平不适合在高血压急症中普遍使用。然而,在特殊情况下(如围手术期高血压和蛛网膜下腔出血),它们可能会被使用。随着进一步研究,它们的作用可能会扩大。对于伴有ICP升高或脑功能障碍的高血压,三甲硫吩可能优于硝普钠。实际上,大多数医生仍会继续使用硝普钠。严密的神经学监测比所使用的具体药物更重要。硝酸甘油是治疗并发严重高血压的急性缺血性心脏病的首选药物;如果无效,则使用硝普钠。对于主动脉夹层,硝普钠和静脉注射普萘洛尔联合使用是首选治疗方法;必须迅速实现β受体阻滞,否则夹层可能会恶化。三甲硫吩也是一线治疗药物。如果延长β受体阻滞可能会严重危及患者,艾司洛尔可作为静脉注射普萘洛尔治疗主动脉夹层的替代药物。对于子痫,除非有妊娠期高血压方面的专家确定了其他替代方案,否则首选治疗药物是肼屈嗪和镁剂。蛛网膜下腔出血的治疗尚在不断变化;钙通道阻滞剂用于预防痉挛,而非降低血压。如果必须立即降低血压,则使用硝普钠。