Lieberman D, Lieberman D, Horowitz S, Horovitz O, Schlaeffer F, Porath A
Pulmonary Unit, Soroka Medical Center of Kupat Holim, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Jul;14(7):577-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01690728.
Community-acquired Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia is a common disease which is usually diagnosed by serological methods. The objective of the present study was to understand the diagnostic significance and test characteristics of two different serological tests used to identify current Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Three hundred sixty-six patients who suffered from community-acquired pneumonia served as the study population. Six hundred ninety-four (328 paired and 38 unpaired) sera were examined for the presence of antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae with commercial kits based on two serological methods, microparticle agglutination and antibody-capture EIA. Agreement between the two kits was 85.2% when individual sera were compared (kappa = 0.62) and 88.5% when patients were compared (Kappa = 0.69). The positive predictive value and the specificity for the identification of current Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection using a single acute-phase serum were 49.3% and 86.9%, respectively, for the microparticle agglutination method, compared to 91.3% and 97.7% for the antibody-capture EIA method (p < 0.001). The negative predictive value and the sensitivity were 86.3% and 48.1% for the microparticle agglutination, not significantly different from the corresponding values of 86.5% and 61.2% for the antibody-capture EIA. It is concluded that the overall agreement between the two methods tested is good, but not perfect. The methods complement each other in the identification of Mycoplasma pneumoniae as the causative agent in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
社区获得性肺炎支原体肺炎是一种常见疾病,通常通过血清学方法进行诊断。本研究的目的是了解用于识别当前肺炎支原体感染的两种不同血清学检测的诊断意义和检测特征。366例社区获得性肺炎患者作为研究人群。采用基于微颗粒凝集和抗体捕获酶免疫分析两种血清学方法的商业试剂盒,检测694份血清(328对配对血清和38份非配对血清)中肺炎支原体抗体的存在情况。当比较个体血清时,两种试剂盒之间的一致性为85.2%(kappa = 0.62),当比较患者时,一致性为88.5%(kappa = 0.69)。使用单一急性期血清识别当前肺炎支原体感染时,微颗粒凝集法的阳性预测值和特异性分别为49.3%和86.9%,而抗体捕获酶免疫分析法的阳性预测值和特异性分别为91.3%和97.7%(p < 0.001)。微颗粒凝集法的阴性预测值和敏感性分别为86.3%和48.1%,与抗体捕获酶免疫分析法相应的86.5%和61.2%无显著差异。结论是,所测试的两种方法之间的总体一致性良好,但并不完美。在识别社区获得性肺炎患者中作为病原体的肺炎支原体时,这两种方法相互补充。