Vasil'eva L A, Ratner V A, Zabanov S A, Iudanin A Ia
Genetika. 1995 Jul;31(7):920-31.
A comparative selection-genetic analysis of three heterogeneous lines of Drosophila melanogaster with an interrupted longitudinal wing vein was performed. In the control line, riC, and two selection lines, riSP and riSN, overall patterns of localization of six families mobile genetic elements (MGE) (MGE) (MDG1, MDG2, MDG3, MDG4, copia, and 297) were compared. In all, the lines contained 220 sites (copies) in 153 segments of the Bridges' map. According to response to selection, six classes of sites were identified: strong positive (P), weak positive (p), neutral (n), weak negative (n), strong negative (N), and abnormal (A). More than 50% of the sites (P+N+p+n) were shown to respond to selection; the contrasting classes (P and N and p and n) counterbalanced each other. These sites are assumed to mark actual parts of the genome, where polygenes are located. In other words, more than 50% of the total number of the genome sites act as polygenes controlling this quantitative character and respond to selection. Pleiotropy of polygenes in such a system must be very high. 22.2% of sites are neutral (class 0); apparently, they do not mark polygenes. The remaining 21.8% of sites (class A) show an anomalous response to selection. They are assumed to mark the polygenes of another genetic system, which participated in the maintenance of homeostasis in the original line riC. On the basis of this evidence, the concept of oligogenes and polygenes is developed. Oligogenes and polygenes are genes that occupy respectively limiting and nonlimiting positions in systems of expression. Adaptive properties of oligogenes are evaluated first and evolve rapidly. Adaptive properties of polygenes are evaluated only with regard to their total set and are limited by oligogenes. Variation of polygenic systems is generated by polygenic combination and spontaneous transpositions and excisions of MGE.
对具有中断纵翅脉的三个黑腹果蝇异质系进行了比较选择 - 遗传分析。在对照系riC以及两个选择系riSP和riSN中,比较了六个家族移动遗传元件(MGE)(MDG1、MDG2、MDG3、MDG4、copia和297)的总体定位模式。这些品系总共在布里奇斯图谱的153个区段中包含220个位点(拷贝)。根据对选择的反应,鉴定出六类位点:强阳性(P)、弱阳性(p)、中性(n)、弱阴性(n)、强阴性(N)和异常(A)。超过50%的位点(P + N + p + n)显示对选择有反应;对比类(P和N以及p和n)相互抵消。假定这些位点标记了基因组的实际部分,多基因就位于此处。换句话说,基因组位点总数的超过50%作为控制该数量性状的多基因起作用并对选择作出反应。在这样一个系统中,多基因的多效性一定非常高。22.2%的位点是中性的(0类);显然,它们不标记多基因。其余21.8%的位点(A类)对选择表现出异常反应。假定它们标记了另一个遗传系统的多基因,该系统参与了原始品系riC中稳态的维持。基于这一证据,发展了寡基因和多基因的概念。寡基因和多基因分别是在表达系统中占据有限和非有限位置的基因。寡基因的适应性特性首先被评估并且进化迅速。多基因的适应性特性仅根据它们的总体集合来评估并且受寡基因限制。多基因系统的变异是由多基因组合以及MGE的自发转座和切除产生的。