Perez E, Slate J R, Neeley R, McDaniel M, Baggs T, Layton K
Arkansas State University, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jul;51(4):540-3. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199507)51:4<540::aid-jclp2270510412>3.0.co;2-j.
Recent changes in legislation for persons with disabilities have led to an increased focus on Central Auditory Processing problems. Test scores from the Clinical Evaluation of Language Functioning-Revised (CELF-R), Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (TONI), and the Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) obtained from folders of 40 clients referred for auditory processing problems were analyzed to ascertain the validity of using these tests with a population on which these tests were not normed. All tests and subscales were correlated significantly. Even so, mean differences were present, with one exception, on comparisons of test scores. Moreover, females obtained significantly higher scores on the TONI than did males. Our findings generally support the validity of using these tests with a Central Auditory Processing sample.
近期针对残疾人的立法变化使得人们对中枢听觉处理问题给予了更多关注。从40名因听觉处理问题前来就诊的患者病历中获取了语言功能临床评估修订版(CELF-R)、非言语智力测试(TONI)以及斯隆智力测试(SIT)的测试分数,以确定在未进行常模测试的人群中使用这些测试的有效性。所有测试及分量表之间均存在显著相关性。即便如此,在测试分数比较中,除一个例外情况外,均存在平均差异。此外,女性在TONI测试中的得分显著高于男性。我们的研究结果总体上支持在中枢听觉处理样本中使用这些测试的有效性。