Lise M, Nitti D, Marchet A, Sahmoud T, Buyse M, Duez N, Fiorentino M, Dos Santos J G, Labianca R, Rougier P
Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica II, Università di Padova, Italy.
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Nov;13(11):2757-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.11.2757.
In a randomized clinical trial (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] no. 40813) on adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer, results obtained after administration of the FAM2 regimen (fluorouracil [5-FU], doxorubicin, and mitomycin) were compared with results obtained after surgery alone to assess the effect of this regimen on overall survival, time to progression, and disease-free interval.
Three hundred fourteen patients who had undergone curative resection for stage II or stage III (International Union Against Cancer [UICC] 1978) gastric adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive chemotherapy (treatment arm) or no further treatment (control arm). The chemotherapy schedule was repeated every 43 days for seven cycles. The log-rank test and the Cox model were used for statistical analysis.
Of 314 patients, 159 comprised the control group and 155 the FAM2 group. Nineteen FAM2 patients never received chemotherapy. The median number of cycles was five. Of the patients started on adjuvant treatment, severe hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity (grades 3 or 4, World Health Organization [WHO] scale) occurred, respectively, in 6% to 9% and in 1% to 29% of cases. The overall 5-year survival rate was 70% for stage II and 32% for stage III patients. No statistically significant difference was found between overall survival of the two treatment arms (P = .295). However, time to progression was significantly delayed in the FAM2 arm (P = .020) and disease-free survival showed borderline significance (P = .068).
FAM2, in view of its high toxicity, cannot be advocated as standard adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. Large-scale clinical trials using more active, less toxic regimens are required to demonstrate whether adjuvant chemotherapy provides any real benefit.
在一项关于胃癌辅助化疗的随机临床试验(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织[EORTC]第40813号)中,比较了给予FAM2方案(氟尿嘧啶[5-FU]、多柔比星和丝裂霉素)后获得的结果与单纯手术后获得的结果,以评估该方案对总生存期、进展时间和无病间期的影响。
314例已接受II期或III期(国际抗癌联盟[UICC]1978年标准)胃腺癌根治性切除术的患者被随机分为接受化疗组(治疗组)或不再接受进一步治疗组(对照组)。化疗方案每43天重复一次,共七个周期。采用对数秩检验和Cox模型进行统计分析。
314例患者中,159例为对照组,155例为FAM2组。19例FAM2组患者从未接受过化疗。中位周期数为5个。在开始辅助治疗的患者中,严重血液学和非血液学毒性(3级或4级,世界卫生组织[WHO]标准)分别发生在6%至9%和1%至29%的病例中。II期患者的总体5年生存率为70%,III期患者为32%。两个治疗组的总生存期之间未发现统计学显著差异(P = 0.295)。然而,FAM2组的进展时间显著延迟(P = 0.020),无病生存期显示出临界显著性(P = 0.068)。
鉴于其高毒性,FAM2不能被推荐为胃癌的标准辅助治疗方案。需要开展使用更有效、毒性更小方案的大规模临床试验,以证明辅助化疗是否能带来实际益处。