Suppr超能文献

三种不同疗法对进展期胃癌术后患者的生存获益:一项网状Meta分析

Survival Benefit of Three Different Therapies in Postoperative Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Wu Dong-Mei, Wang Shan, Wen Xin, Han Xin-Rui, Wang Yong-Jian, Shen Min, Fan Shao-Hua, Zhang Zi-Feng, Zhuang Juan, Shan Qun, Li Meng-Qiu, Hu Bin, Sun Chun-Hui, Lu Jun, Zheng Yuan-Lin

机构信息

Key Laboratory for Biotechnology on Medicinal Plants of Jiangsu Province, School of Life Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.

College of Health Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 22;9:929. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00929. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Gastric cancer is mainly treated by gastrectomy, the results of which were unsatisfactory without any adjuvant treatments. This study aimed to examine the performance of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy after surgery in order to acquire the optimal adjuvant treatment. Embase and PubMed were retrieved to conduct a systematic research. Hazard ratios (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as outcomes were calculated by synthesizing direct and indirect evidence to evaluate the efficacy of three treatments against surgery alone. The -score ranking was utilized to rank the therapies. Consistency was assessed by heat plot. Begg's test was performed to evaluate publication bias. A total of 35 randomized controlled studies (RCTs) with 8973 patients were included in our network meta-analysis (NMA). As for efficacy outcomes, OS and PFS of 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, all revealed chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the best of three adjuvant therapies. Meanwhile, -score ranking results also displayed that CRT was the optimal regimen. Additionally, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) were two alternative options following CRT since RT performed well in short-term survival while CT could improve the long-term survival. CRT was the most recommended therapy to accompany surgery according to our results. However, no analysis about the safety of these three treatments was mentioned in our study. Further studies including safety outcomes were required to draw a more comprehensive conclusion.

摘要

胃癌主要通过胃切除术治疗,在没有任何辅助治疗的情况下,其效果并不理想。本研究旨在探讨术后放疗、化疗及放化疗的疗效,以获得最佳辅助治疗方案。检索Embase和PubMed进行系统研究。通过综合直接和间接证据计算总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的风险比(HR),以评估三种治疗方法相对于单纯手术的疗效。采用Z评分排序对治疗方法进行排名。通过热图评估一致性。进行Begg检验以评估发表偏倚。我们的网络荟萃分析(NMA)共纳入了35项随机对照试验(RCT),涉及8973例患者。在疗效方面,1年、2年、3年和5年的OS和PFS均显示,放化疗(CRT)是三种辅助治疗中效果最佳的。同时,Z评分排序结果也表明CRT是最佳方案。此外,放疗(RT)和化疗(CT)是CRT之后的两种替代选择,因为RT在短期生存方面表现良好,而CT可改善长期生存。根据我们的结果,CRT是最推荐的辅助手术治疗方法。然而,我们的研究未提及对这三种治疗安全性的分析。需要进一步开展包括安全性指标的研究以得出更全面的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/1cc9ade93692/fphar-09-00929-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验