• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同疗法对进展期胃癌术后患者的生存获益:一项网状Meta分析

Survival Benefit of Three Different Therapies in Postoperative Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Wu Dong-Mei, Wang Shan, Wen Xin, Han Xin-Rui, Wang Yong-Jian, Shen Min, Fan Shao-Hua, Zhang Zi-Feng, Zhuang Juan, Shan Qun, Li Meng-Qiu, Hu Bin, Sun Chun-Hui, Lu Jun, Zheng Yuan-Lin

机构信息

Key Laboratory for Biotechnology on Medicinal Plants of Jiangsu Province, School of Life Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.

College of Health Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 22;9:929. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00929. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2018.00929
PMID:30210338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6119769/
Abstract

Gastric cancer is mainly treated by gastrectomy, the results of which were unsatisfactory without any adjuvant treatments. This study aimed to examine the performance of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy after surgery in order to acquire the optimal adjuvant treatment. Embase and PubMed were retrieved to conduct a systematic research. Hazard ratios (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as outcomes were calculated by synthesizing direct and indirect evidence to evaluate the efficacy of three treatments against surgery alone. The -score ranking was utilized to rank the therapies. Consistency was assessed by heat plot. Begg's test was performed to evaluate publication bias. A total of 35 randomized controlled studies (RCTs) with 8973 patients were included in our network meta-analysis (NMA). As for efficacy outcomes, OS and PFS of 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, all revealed chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the best of three adjuvant therapies. Meanwhile, -score ranking results also displayed that CRT was the optimal regimen. Additionally, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) were two alternative options following CRT since RT performed well in short-term survival while CT could improve the long-term survival. CRT was the most recommended therapy to accompany surgery according to our results. However, no analysis about the safety of these three treatments was mentioned in our study. Further studies including safety outcomes were required to draw a more comprehensive conclusion.

摘要

胃癌主要通过胃切除术治疗,在没有任何辅助治疗的情况下,其效果并不理想。本研究旨在探讨术后放疗、化疗及放化疗的疗效,以获得最佳辅助治疗方案。检索Embase和PubMed进行系统研究。通过综合直接和间接证据计算总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的风险比(HR),以评估三种治疗方法相对于单纯手术的疗效。采用Z评分排序对治疗方法进行排名。通过热图评估一致性。进行Begg检验以评估发表偏倚。我们的网络荟萃分析(NMA)共纳入了35项随机对照试验(RCT),涉及8973例患者。在疗效方面,1年、2年、3年和5年的OS和PFS均显示,放化疗(CRT)是三种辅助治疗中效果最佳的。同时,Z评分排序结果也表明CRT是最佳方案。此外,放疗(RT)和化疗(CT)是CRT之后的两种替代选择,因为RT在短期生存方面表现良好,而CT可改善长期生存。根据我们的结果,CRT是最推荐的辅助手术治疗方法。然而,我们的研究未提及对这三种治疗安全性的分析。需要进一步开展包括安全性指标的研究以得出更全面的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/086b029b759c/fphar-09-00929-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/1cc9ade93692/fphar-09-00929-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/6963647b26c4/fphar-09-00929-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/6c23ba28b084/fphar-09-00929-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/ef510c32a0ac/fphar-09-00929-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/507424fa1c6b/fphar-09-00929-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/174a10cb6484/fphar-09-00929-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/086b029b759c/fphar-09-00929-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/1cc9ade93692/fphar-09-00929-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/6963647b26c4/fphar-09-00929-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/6c23ba28b084/fphar-09-00929-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/ef510c32a0ac/fphar-09-00929-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/507424fa1c6b/fphar-09-00929-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/174a10cb6484/fphar-09-00929-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca21/6119769/086b029b759c/fphar-09-00929-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival Benefit of Three Different Therapies in Postoperative Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.三种不同疗法对进展期胃癌术后患者的生存获益:一项网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 22;9:929. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00929. eCollection 2018.
2
Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments Compared to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.局部晚期宫颈癌患者新辅助治疗和辅助治疗与同步放化疗的比较:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 16;12:745522. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.745522. eCollection 2022.
3
The optimal strategy of multimodality therapies for resectable gastric cancer: evidence from a network meta-analysis.可切除胃癌多模态治疗的最佳策略:来自网络荟萃分析的证据。
J Cancer. 2019 Jun 2;10(14):3094-3101. doi: 10.7150/jca.30456. eCollection 2019.
4
Individual patient data network meta-analysis using either restricted mean survival time difference or hazard ratios: is there a difference? A case study on locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas.个体患者数据网络荟萃分析使用受限平均生存时间差或风险比:有区别吗?一项局部晚期鼻咽癌的病例研究。
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 15;8(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0984-x.
5
Chemoradiotherapy regimens for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.局部晚期鼻咽癌的放化疗方案:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Aug;51(12):1570-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.027. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
6
The Optimal Treatment for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of 6168 Patients.可切除食管癌的最佳治疗方法:对6168例患者的网络荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 10;11:628706. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628706. eCollection 2021.
7
The Changing Therapeutic Role of Chemo-radiotherapy for Loco-regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma from Two/Three-Dimensional Radiotherapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis.从二维/三维放疗到调强放疗:局部晚期鼻咽癌化放疗治疗作用的变化:一项网状荟萃分析。
Theranostics. 2017 Oct 17;7(19):4825-4835. doi: 10.7150/thno.21815. eCollection 2017.
8
Prognosis of surgery combined with different adjuvant therapies in esophageal cancer treatment: a network meta-analysis.手术联合不同辅助治疗在食管癌治疗中的预后:一项网状Meta分析
Oncotarget. 2017 May 30;8(22):36339-36353. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16193.
9
Survival After Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments Compared to Surgery Alone for Resectable Esophageal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis.新辅助和辅助治疗与单纯手术治疗可切除食管癌的生存率比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):481-491. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001905.
10
Comparative effectiveness of preoperative, postoperative and perioperative treatments for resectable gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis of the literature from the past 20 years.可切除胃癌术前、术后及围手术期治疗的比较效果:对过去20年文献的网状Meta分析
Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):563-574. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The synergistic effect of physical activity and nutrition to improve the quality of life in breast cancer patients: a systemic review.体育活动与营养对改善乳腺癌患者生活质量的协同作用:一项系统综述。
Phys Act Nutr. 2022 Dec;26(4):22-31. doi: 10.20463/pan.2022.0021. Epub 2022 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
The 30-year experience-A meta-analysis of randomised and high-quality non-randomised studies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer.30年经验——热腹腔内化疗治疗胃癌的随机及高质量非随机研究的荟萃分析
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jul;79:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2
Systematic review with network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of different enteral immunonutrition formulas in patients underwent gastrectomy.系统评价与网状Meta分析:不同肠内免疫营养配方对胃癌切除患者的比较疗效
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 4;8(14):23376-23388. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15580.
3
Short-term efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.
不同化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的短期疗效:一项网状Meta分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 6;8(23):37896-37911. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14664.
4
A Bayesian network meta-analysis on second-line systemic therapy in advanced gastric cancer.一项关于晚期胃癌二线全身治疗的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jul;20(4):646-654. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0656-7. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
5
Postoperative chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy for R0 resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: an up-to-date meta-analysis.D2淋巴结清扫的R0切除胃癌术后同步放化疗与单纯化疗的比较:一项最新的荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug 8;14(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0957-7.
6
Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.基于氟嘧啶的化疗作为晚期胃癌的一线治疗:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2016 Oct;22(4):853-61. doi: 10.1007/s12253-016-0078-1. Epub 2016 May 28.
7
Second-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: Interpreting outcomes by network meta-analysis.晚期胃癌的二线治疗:通过网状Meta分析解读结果
World J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 10;6(4):73-9. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v6.i4.73.
8
Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods.在频率主义网络荟萃分析中对治疗方法进行排序无需重采样方法即可实现。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jul 31;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8.
9
Phase III Trial to Compare Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Capecitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Final Report of the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors Trial, Including Survival and Subset Analyses.比较卡培他滨和顺铂辅助化疗与同期放化疗治疗胃癌的 III 期临床试验:胃癌辅助放化疗临床试验的最终报告,包括生存和亚组分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3130-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3930. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
10
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.辅助放化疗与单纯化疗治疗胃癌的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;111(3):277-84. doi: 10.1002/jso.23795. Epub 2014 Oct 1.