Suppr超能文献

实体瘤患者静脉注射磷酸依托泊苷和依托泊苷后依托泊苷的药代动力学和生物等效性

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of etoposide following intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate and etoposide in patients with solid tumors.

作者信息

Kaul S, Igwemezie L N, Stewart D J, Fields S Z, Kosty M, Levithan N, Bukowski R, Gandara D, Goss G, O'Dwyer P

机构信息

Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1995 Nov;13(11):2835-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.11.2835.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of etoposide following intravenous (i.v.) administration of etoposide phosphate (Etopophos; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ), a prodrug of etoposide, and VePesid (Bristol-Myers Squibb).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine solid tumor patients were randomized to receive Etopophos or VePesid on day 1 of a day-1,3,5 schedule of treatment. The alternate drug was given on day 3 and repeated on day 5. The dose, 150 mg/m2 of etoposide equivalent, was administered by constant rate infusion over 3.5 hours. The plasma concentrations of etoposide phosphate and etoposide were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assays. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by a noncompartmental method. Etopophos was considered to be bioequivalent to VePesid if the 90% confidence limits for the differences in mean maximum concentration (Cmax) and AUCinf of etoposide were contained within 80% to 125% for the long-transformed data.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were assessable for pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence assessment. Following i.v. administration, etoposide phosphate was rapidly and extensively converted to etoposide in systemic circulation, resulting in insufficient data to estimate its pharmacokinetics. The mean bioavailability of etoposide from Etopophos, relative to VePesid, was 103% (90% confidence interval, 99% to 106%) based on Cmax, and 107% (90 confidence interval, 105% to 110%) based on area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity (AUCinf) values. Mean terminal elimination half-life (t1/2), steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), and total systemic clearance (CL) values of etoposide were approximately 7 hours, 7 L/m2, and 17 mL/min/m2 after Etopophos and VePesid treatments, respectively. The main toxicity observed was myelosuppression, characterized by leukopenia and neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

With respect to plasma levels of etoposide, i.v. Etopophos is bioequivalent to i.v. VePesid.

摘要

目的

评估静脉注射依托泊苷磷酸酯(Etopophos;百时美施贵宝公司,新泽西州普林斯顿)(依托泊苷的前体药物)和VePesid(百时美施贵宝公司)后依托泊苷的药代动力学和生物等效性。

患者和方法

49例实体瘤患者被随机分配,在第1、3、5天的治疗方案中于第1天接受Etopophos或VePesid治疗。在第3天给予另一种药物,并在第5天重复给药。以150mg/m²的依托泊苷等效剂量通过恒速输注3.5小时给药。使用经过验证的高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析法测定依托泊苷磷酸酯和依托泊苷的血浆浓度。通过非房室方法计算药代动力学参数。对于经对数转换的数据,如果依托泊苷的平均最大浓度(Cmax)和药时曲线下面积从零至无穷大(AUCinf)差异的90%置信区间包含在80%至125%范围内,则认为Etopophos与VePesid具有生物等效性。

结果

41例患者可用于药代动力学和生物等效性评估。静脉给药后,依托泊苷磷酸酯在体循环中迅速且广泛地转化为依托泊苷,导致无法获得足够数据来估计其药代动力学。基于Cmax,相对于VePesid,依托泊苷从Etopophos的平均生物利用度为103%(90%置信区间,99%至106%);基于从零至无穷大的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUCinf)值,平均生物利用度为107%(90%置信区间,105%至110%)。在接受Etopophos和VePesid治疗后,依托泊苷的平均终末消除半衰期(t1/2)、稳态分布容积(Vss)和总全身清除率(CL)值分别约为7小时、7L/m²和17mL/min/m²。观察到的主要毒性为骨髓抑制,表现为白细胞减少和中性粒细胞减少。

结论

就依托泊苷的血浆水平而言,静脉注射Etopophos与静脉注射VePesid具有生物等效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验