Kröner-Herwig B, Hebing G, van Rijn-Kalkmann U, Frenzel A, Schilkowsky G, Esser G
Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
J Psychosom Res. 1995 Feb;39(2):153-65. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00098-p.
Two non-medical treatment strategies for chronic idiopathic tinnitus were evaluated in a randomized control group design. A cognitive-behavioural tinnitus coping training (TCT) was developed and compared to yoga and a self-monitoring control condition. Forty-three chronic tinnitus patients, were assessed at baseline, directly after therapy, and at 3 months follow-up. For evaluation, differential psychoacoustic variables were registered, a tinnitus diary as well as the Tinnitus Questionnaire and different measures of general well-being were used. Statistical analyses showed effects favouring the TCT treatment in comparison to the control and yoga treatment. The TCT-treated patients reported more satisfaction with the training than the yoga group. Participants in the self-monitoring control group were treated either by TCT or yoga after a waiting period. The outcome in this group was even better than in the experimental groups while yoga again showed rather poor effects.
在一项随机对照试验设计中，对慢性特发性耳鸣的两种非药物治疗策略进行了评估。开发了一种认知行为耳鸣应对训练（TCT），并将其与瑜伽和自我监测对照条件进行比较。43名慢性耳鸣患者在基线、治疗结束后以及3个月随访时接受评估。为进行评估，记录了不同的心理声学变量，使用了耳鸣日记、耳鸣问卷以及不同的总体幸福感测量方法。统计分析表明，与对照和瑜伽治疗相比，TCT治疗效果更佳。接受TCT治疗的患者对训练的满意度高于瑜伽组。自我监测对照组的参与者在等待期后接受了TCT或瑜伽治疗。该组的结果甚至优于实验组，而瑜伽的效果再次较差。
