Hunink M G, Wong J B, Donaldson M C, Meyerovitz M F, de Vries J, Harrington D P
Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
JAMA. 1995 Jul 12;274(2):165-71.
To evaluate the relative benefits and cost-effectiveness of revascularization for femoropopliteal disease using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or bypass surgery.
Decision analysis using a multistate transition simulation model (Markov process) and cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the health care system.
Based on mortality, morbidity, patency, and cost data from a literature review.
Hypothetical cohort of patients with chronic femoropopliteal disease who desire revascularization. Subgroup analysis for patients defined by age, sex, indication, lesion type, and graft type.
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, bypass surgery, and a strategies combining the two treatments.
Five-year patency results, quality-adjusted life expectancy, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
For 65-year-old men with disabling claudication and a femoropopliteal stenosis or occlusion and for 65-year-old men with chronic critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal stenosis, initial angioplasty increased quality-adjusted life expectancy by 2 to 13 months and resulted in decreased lifetime expenditures compared with bypass surgery. For patients with chronic critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal occlusion, initial bypass surgery increased quality-adjusted life expectancy by 1 to 4 months and resulted in decreased lifetime expenditures compared with angioplasty. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that angioplasty would always be the preferred initial treatment if the angioplasty 5-year patency rate exceeds 30%.
Angioplasty is the preferred initial treatment in patients with disabling claudication and a femoropopliteal stenosis or occlusion and in those with chronic critical ischemia and a stenosis. Bypass surgery is the preferred initial treatment in patients with chronic critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal occlusion.
评估经皮腔内血管成形术或搭桥手术对股腘动脉疾病进行血运重建的相对益处和成本效益。
使用多状态转换模拟模型(马尔可夫过程)进行决策分析,并从医疗保健系统的角度进行成本效益分析。
基于文献综述中的死亡率、发病率、通畅率和成本数据。
假设的希望进行血运重建的慢性股腘动脉疾病患者队列。按年龄、性别、适应症、病变类型和移植物类型对患者进行亚组分析。
经皮腔内血管成形术、搭桥手术以及两种治疗方法相结合的策略。
五年通畅结果、质量调整生命预期、终生成本和增量成本效益比。
对于患有致残性间歇性跛行且股腘动脉狭窄或闭塞的65岁男性,以及患有慢性严重缺血且股腘动脉狭窄的65岁男性,与搭桥手术相比,初始血管成形术可使质量调整生命预期延长2至13个月,并降低终生支出。对于患有慢性严重缺血且股腘动脉闭塞的患者,与血管成形术相比,初始搭桥手术可使质量调整生命预期延长1至4个月,并降低终生支出。敏感性分析表明,如果血管成形术的五年通畅率超过30%,则血管成形术始终是首选的初始治疗方法。
血管成形术是患有致残性间歇性跛行且股腘动脉狭窄或闭塞的患者以及患有慢性严重缺血且狭窄的患者的首选初始治疗方法。搭桥手术是患有慢性严重缺血且股腘动脉闭塞的患者的首选初始治疗方法。