• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利剖宫产的危险因素:一项多中心研究的结果

Risk factors for caesarean section in Italy: results of a multicentre study.

作者信息

Signorelli C, Cattaruzza M S, Osborn J F

机构信息

Institute of Hygiene, School of Medicine, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Public Health. 1995 May;109(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80052-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80052-6
PMID:7597132
Abstract

A recent large increase in Caesarean section (CS) in Italy was the initial stimulus for a study to identify risk factors for CS and, if possible, to suggest strategies to counteract the rise. The study was conducted in three hospitals where a wide range of individual variables was collected from the clinical records and from personal interviews. Crude CS rates and odds ratios were evaluated for each single variable while logistic regression has been used to investigate possible confounding factors. The study involved 1316 consecutive deliveries. Crude CS rates were 29.4%, 15.7% and 16.1%. Variables identified as high risk factors were pre-eclampsia, previous CS, breech and other non-vertex presentations. Antenatal care under an obstetrician working in the same hospital, a low number of antenatal consultations, previous miscarriages, offer (by obstetrician) and request (by women) for CS showed significantly high odds ratios (ORs). Previous live births was strongly negatively associated with CS. No relationship between type of delivery and social status was observed while a physician factor was detected in all three hospitals where rates for different physicians ranged from 0% to 52.8%. Apart from the main medical indications for Caesarean section (previous CS, breech presentation), the results seem to indicate that individual practice style may be an important determinant of the wide variation in the rates of Caesarean delivery. While this may have been suspected before this study, these results are the first hard data to indicate that, in Italy, CS is widely performed for non-medical reasons.

摘要

近期意大利剖宫产率大幅上升,这是开展一项研究的最初动因,该研究旨在确定剖宫产的风险因素,并在可能的情况下提出应对剖宫产率上升的策略。这项研究在三家医院进行,从临床记录和个人访谈中收集了广泛的个体变量。对每个单一变量评估了粗剖宫产率和比值比,同时使用逻辑回归来调查可能的混杂因素。该研究涉及1316例连续分娩。粗剖宫产率分别为29.4%、15.7%和16.1%。被确定为高风险因素的变量有子痫前期、既往剖宫产史、臀位及其他非头位胎位。由同一家医院的产科医生进行产前护理、产前检查次数少、既往流产史、产科医生提议(剖宫产)及产妇要求(剖宫产)的比值比显著较高。既往活产与剖宫产呈强烈负相关。未观察到分娩方式与社会地位之间的关系,而在所有三家医院均检测到医生因素,不同医生的剖宫产率在0%至52.8%之间。除了剖宫产的主要医学指征(既往剖宫产史、臀位)外,结果似乎表明个体医疗行为方式可能是剖宫产率广泛差异的一个重要决定因素。虽然在本研究之前可能就有人怀疑这一点,但这些结果是首批确凿数据,表明在意大利,剖宫产广泛用于非医学原因。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for caesarean section in Italy: results of a multicentre study.意大利剖宫产的危险因素:一项多中心研究的结果
Public Health. 1995 May;109(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80052-6.
2
A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China.中国大陆剖宫产指征的描述性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Dec 12;14:410. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0410-2.
3
Trend in primary caesarean delivery: a five-year experience in ABRUZZO, ITALY.原发性剖宫产的趋势:意大利阿布鲁佐地区的五年经验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3332-2.
4
Caesarean scar pregnancy: time to explore indications of the caesarean sections?剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:是时候探讨剖宫产的指征了?
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;39(3):365-371. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1519529. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study.埃及剖宫产的医学和非医学原因:一项基于医院的回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2558-2.
6
Determinants of caesarean section rates in Italy.意大利剖宫产率的决定因素。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Mar;99(3):203-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14499.x.
7
Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.医院剖宫产率的不明原因变化。
Med J Aust. 2013 Sep 2;199(5):348-53. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10279.
8
Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.剖宫产率医院间比较的风险调整:必要性、有效性和简约性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 15;6:100. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-100.
9
Cesarean section in twin pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.丹麦两个剖宫产率不同的郡双胎妊娠剖宫产情况
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Feb;73(2):123-8. doi: 10.3109/00016349409013414.
10
[Risk factors analysis for elective caesarean section in Campania region (Italy)].[意大利坎帕尼亚地区择期剖宫产的危险因素分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):101-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Caesarean Section on Maternal Request-Ethical and Juridic Issues: A Narrative Review.产妇要求剖宫产术的伦理和法律问题:叙事性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 10;58(9):1255. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091255.
2
"An unnecessary cut?" multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: a systematic review.“不必要的剖宫产?”意大利剖宫产率驱动因素的多层次卫生系统分析:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1.
3
Socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with caesarean section delivery in Southern Ghana: evidence from INDEPTH Network member site.
加纳南部与剖宫产分娩相关的社会经济和人口因素:来自 INDEPTH 网络成员站点的证据。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2039-z.
4
Influencing factors in choosing delivery method: Iranian primiparous women's perspective.选择分娩方式的影响因素:伊朗初产妇的观点。
Electron Physician. 2017 Apr 25;9(4):4150-4154. doi: 10.19082/4150. eCollection 2017 Apr.
5
Caesarean delivery and its correlates in Northern Region of Bangladesh: application of logistic regression and cox proportional hazard model.孟加拉国北部地区的剖宫产及其相关因素:逻辑回归和Cox比例风险模型的应用
J Health Popul Nutr. 2015 Jul 31;33:8. doi: 10.1186/s41043-015-0020-2.
6
Prevalence and Causes of Cesarean Section in Iran: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伊朗剖宫产的患病率及原因:系统评价与荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2014 May;43(5):545-55.
7
Determinants of Caesarean Risk Factor in Northern Region of Bangladesh: A Multivariate Analysis.孟加拉国北部地区剖宫产风险因素的决定因素:一项多变量分析。
Iran J Public Health. 2014 Jan;43(1):16-27.
8
Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.剖宫产率医院间比较的风险调整:必要性、有效性和简约性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 15;6:100. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-100.