Newnham D M, Grove A, McDevitt D G, Lipworth B J
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, UK.
Thorax. 1995 May;50(5):497-504. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.5.497.
There is controversy as to the role of long acting beta 2 agonists such as eformoterol and, in particular, whether bronchodilator tolerance occurs during continuous therapy. The purpose of this study was to extend previous observations of bronchodilator subsensitivity with metered dose eformoterol aerosol in order to assess whether tolerance also occurs with a dry powder formulation of the same drug.
Sixteen asthmatic patients of mean age 33 (range 18-53) years and FEV1 (% predicted) of 64 (3)%, of whom 13 were receiving inhaled corticosteroids, received regular treatment with eformoterol 24 micrograms twice daily or placebo twice daily (without beta 2 agonists) given concurrently for four weeks in a randomised double blind cross-over design. An initial two week run-in was used when beta 2 agonists were withdrawn and substituted with ipratropium bromide. Dose-response curves to eformoterol (cumulative dose 6-102 micrograms) for airways and systemic beta 2 responses were constructed at the end of each treatment period.
Baseline values for airways and systemic responses were similar. The peak delta FEV1 response from the dose-response curve (as change from baseline) and the delta response for FEV1 and FEF25-75 at six hours after the last dose were attenuated after eformoterol compared with placebo: peak delta FEV1 response 1.001 with placebo v 0.841 with eformoterol (95% CI 0.04 to 0.28); at six hours 0.931 with placebo v 0.581 with eformoterol (95% CI 0.20 to 0.50); and for delta FEF25-75 at six hours 1.29 1/s with placebo v 0.87 1/s with eformoterol (95% CI 0.15 to 0.69). Morning peak expiratory flow rate was significantly improved during treatment with eformoterol (451 1/min) compared with placebo (399 1/min) (95% CI 21 to 82). Systemic beta 2 responses were blunted after eformoterol, together with a reduction in lymphocyte beta 2 receptor binding density.
Regular twice daily eformoterol dry powder may produce bronchodilator subsensitivity in terms of both peak and duration of response to cumulative repeated doses of eformoterol. Systemic beta 2-mediated adverse effects also showed tolerance, which was mirrored by downregulation of lymphocyte beta 2 adrenoceptors.
对于长效β2激动剂(如福莫特罗)的作用存在争议,尤其是在持续治疗期间是否会出现支气管扩张剂耐受性。本研究的目的是扩展先前关于定量气雾剂福莫特罗支气管扩张剂敏感性降低的观察结果,以评估同一药物的干粉制剂是否也会出现耐受性。
16例平均年龄33岁(范围18 - 53岁)、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1,预测值百分比)为64(3)%的哮喘患者,其中13例正在接受吸入性糖皮质激素治疗,采用随机双盲交叉设计,接受为期四周的每日两次24微克福莫特罗或每日两次安慰剂(不含β2激动剂)常规治疗。在停用β2激动剂并用异丙托溴铵替代时,进行了为期两周的导入期。在每个治疗期结束时,构建了福莫特罗(累积剂量6 - 102微克)对气道和全身β2反应的剂量反应曲线。
气道和全身反应的基线值相似。与安慰剂相比,福莫特罗治疗后,剂量反应曲线的峰值ΔFEV1反应(相对于基线的变化)以及最后一剂后6小时的FEV1和FEF25 - 75的Δ反应均减弱:安慰剂组的峰值ΔFEV1反应为1.001,福莫特罗组为0.841(95%可信区间0.04至0.28);6小时时,安慰剂组为0.931,福莫特罗组为0.581(95%可信区间0.20至0.50);6小时时,安慰剂组的ΔFEF25 - 75为1.29升/秒,福莫特罗组为0.87升/秒(95%可信区间0.15至0.69)。与安慰剂(399升/分钟)相比,福莫特罗治疗期间早晨呼气峰值流速显著改善(451升/分钟)(95%可信区间21至82)。福莫特罗治疗后全身β2反应减弱,同时淋巴细胞β2受体结合密度降低。
每日两次规律使用福莫特罗干粉在对累积重复剂量福莫特罗的反应峰值和持续时间方面可能产生支气管扩张剂敏感性降低。全身β2介导的不良反应也表现出耐受性,淋巴细胞β2肾上腺素能受体下调反映了这一点。