Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房真的需要洗手吗?

Is hand washing really needed in an intensive care unit?

作者信息

Rossoff L J, Borenstein M, Isenberg H D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1995 Jul;23(7):1211-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199507000-00010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a rigorous antiseptic hand washing of bare hands with 4% chlorhexidine and alcohol reduced fingertip microbial colonization as compared with the use of boxed, clean, nonsterile latex gloves. In addition, to investigate if aseptic donning technique and/or a prior hand washing would reduce the level of glove contamination.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, crossover design, with each subject serving as his/her own control.

SETTING

University intensive care unit.

SUBJECTS

Forty-three intensive care nurses.

INTERVENTIONS

The fingertips of 20 nurses were cultured before and after a strict antiseptic hand washing and before and after the routine and aseptic donning of sterile gloves. Subsequently, the fingertips of 43 nurses were cultured before and after the casual donning of nonsterile gloves over unwashed hands and before and after a strict antiseptic hand washing. Fingertip cultures were plated directly on agar, incubated for 24 hrs, and counted and recorded as the number of colony-forming units (cfu) for each hand. Different colony types were then subcultured.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Hand washing with antiseptic reduced colonization from 84 to 2 cfu (p < .001). The proportion of cases with > or = 200 cfu/hand was reduced from 30% to 9%. Aseptic or casual donning of sterile gloves, with or without prior antiseptic hand washing, resulted in consistently low glove counts between 0 and 1.25 cfu. Nonsterile gloves casually donned over washed or unwashed bare hands diminished the bioburden to 2.17 and 1.34 cfu, respectively. No qualitative difference was found in the microorganisms recovered from gloved or bare hands.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiseptic hand washing and the use of nonsterile gloves over unwashed hands confer similar reductions in the number of microorganisms. There is no additional benefit with the use of aseptic donning technique, prior antiseptic hand washing, or the use of individually packaged sterile gloves.

摘要

目的

确定与使用盒装、清洁、非无菌乳胶手套相比,用4%洗必泰和酒精对手部进行严格的抗菌洗手是否能减少指尖微生物定植。此外,研究无菌戴手套技术和/或预先洗手是否会降低手套污染水平。

设计

前瞻性、随机、交叉设计,每个受试者作为自身对照。

地点

大学重症监护病房。

受试者

43名重症监护护士。

干预措施

对20名护士的指尖在严格抗菌洗手前后以及常规和无菌戴无菌手套前后进行培养。随后,对43名护士的指尖在未洗手的手上随意戴上非无菌手套前后以及严格抗菌洗手前后进行培养。指尖培养物直接接种在琼脂上,孵育24小时,计数并记录每只手的菌落形成单位(cfu)数量。然后对不同菌落类型进行传代培养。

测量和主要结果

抗菌洗手使定植菌数从84 cfu降至2 cfu(p < 0.001)。每只手菌落数≥200 cfu的病例比例从30%降至9%。无论是否预先进行抗菌洗手,无菌戴手套(无菌或随意)导致手套菌落数始终较低,在0至1.25 cfu之间。在洗过或未洗的裸手上随意戴上非无菌手套,生物负荷分别降至2.17 cfu和1.34 cfu。从戴手套或裸手上分离出的微生物在定性上没有差异。

结论

抗菌洗手和在未洗手的手上使用非无菌手套在减少微生物数量方面效果相似。使用无菌戴手套技术、预先进行抗菌洗手或使用单独包装的无菌手套没有额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验