Suppr超能文献

“盗血”是一种尚未明确的机制,与脑动静脉畸形的临床表现有关。

'Steal' is an unestablished mechanism for the clinical presentation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

作者信息

Mast H, Mohr J P, Osipov A, Pile-Spellman J, Marshall R S, Lazar R M, Stein B M, Young W L

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 1995 Jul;26(7):1215-20. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.7.1215.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Focal neurological deficits (FNDs) in patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have been widely attributed to the phenomenon of "cerebral steal." The incidence of focal deficits was investigated in a large prospective sample.

METHODS

Using data from patient history and examination, CT or MRI, and transcranial Doppler sonography, we studied 152 consecutive, prospective AVM patients for evidence of FNDs unrelated to a hemorrhagic event. Feeding mean arterial pressure was measured during superselective angiography.

RESULTS

Two (1.3%) of 152 patients met the criteria for a progressive FND. Nonprogressive FNDs were seen in 11 (7.2%) patients (stable in 4.6%, reversible in 2.6%). The median observation time period was 17 months (range, 1 to 60 months). There were no differences in transcranial Doppler mean velocities in feeding arteries in FND versus non-FND groups (118 +/- 44 versus 112 +/- 37 cm/s, P > .05) or pulsatility indexes (0.53 +/- 0.20 versus 0.55 +/- 0.15, P > .05). Feeding artery pressure was similar in FND (n = 10) and non-FND (n = 96) groups (39 +/- 16 versus 39 +/- 16 mm Hg at a systemic pressure of 82 +/- 18 versus 75 +/- 14 mm Hg, NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonhemorrhagic focal neurological syndromes in AVM patients are infrequent. Progressive deficits are especially rare. There was no relation between feeding artery pressure or flow velocities and FND. There does not appear to be sufficient evidence to assign steal as an operative pathophysiological mechanism in the vast majority of AVM patients.

摘要

背景与目的

动静脉畸形(AVM)患者的局灶性神经功能缺损(FNDs)一直被广泛归因于“脑盗血”现象。我们在一个大型前瞻性样本中调查了局灶性缺损的发生率。

方法

利用患者病史及检查、CT或MRI以及经颅多普勒超声检查的数据,我们对152例连续的前瞻性AVM患者进行研究,以寻找与出血事件无关的FNDs证据。在超选择性血管造影期间测量供血平均动脉压。

结果

152例患者中有2例(1.3%)符合进行性FND的标准。11例(7.2%)患者出现非进行性FNDs(4.6%稳定,2.6%可逆)。中位观察期为17个月(范围1至60个月)。FND组与非FND组供血动脉的经颅多普勒平均速度(分别为118±44与112±37 cm/s,P>.05)或搏动指数(分别为0.53±0.20与0.55±0.15,P>.05)无差异。FND组(n = 10)与非FND组(n = 96)的供血动脉压力相似(在体循环压力分别为82±18与75±14 mmHg时,为39±16与39±16 mmHg,无显著性差异)。

结论

AVM患者的非出血性局灶性神经综合征并不常见。进行性缺损尤其罕见。供血动脉压力或血流速度与FND之间无关联。在绝大多数AVM患者中,似乎没有足够的证据将盗血作为手术病理生理机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验