Shirado O, Ito T, Kaneda K, Strax T E
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Jul;76(7):604-11. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80628-8.
The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of test postures on trunk muscle strength, and to clarify the difference between concentric and eccentric strength of healthy subjects and patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). Volunteered and controlled trials took place at a university hospital, which is a referral center and is also open to the general community. The patients were selected from the outpatient care in the university hospital. Fifty healthy subjects (25 men and 25 women; average age 25.7 years, ranging from 23 to 34 years) and 48 patients with CLBP (26 men and 22 women; average age 33.5 years, ranging from 26 to 39 years) volunteered for this study. The main outcome measures were flexor and extensor peak torque/body weight, and flexor/extensor peak torque ratio during concentric and eccentric contractions; Eccentric/concentric peak torque ratio in flexor and extensor. Trunk-muscle strength was significantly greater in the sitting posture when measured with the subjects' feet against the floor (p < .05). Some patients complained of a slight low-back pain during testing, although the pain was not aggravated in any patients. In both concentric and eccentric contraction modes, the patients with CLBP had greater flexor/extensor ratios than the healthy subjects (p < .01). This implies that extensors are more affected in these patients. However, a great imbalance between concentric and eccentric strength of the patients was found, not only in extensors, but also in flexors (p < .01). The current study shows that one should consider the test posture carefully when measuring trunk-muscle strength.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是确定测试姿势对躯干肌肉力量的影响,并阐明健康受试者和慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的向心力量与离心力量之间的差异。在一家大学医院进行了自愿和对照试验,该医院是一个转诊中心,也向普通社区开放。患者从大学医院的门诊护理中选取。50名健康受试者(25名男性和25名女性;平均年龄25.7岁,范围为23至34岁)和48名CLBP患者(26名男性和22名女性;平均年龄33.5岁,范围为26至39岁)自愿参与本研究。主要结局指标为向心和离心收缩期间的屈肌和伸肌峰值扭矩/体重,以及屈肌/伸肌峰值扭矩比值;屈肌和伸肌的离心/向心峰值扭矩比值。当受试者双脚着地测量时,坐姿下的躯干肌肉力量显著更大(p <.05)。一些患者在测试期间抱怨有轻微的下腰痛,尽管没有任何患者的疼痛加重。在向心和离心收缩模式下,CLBP患者的屈肌/伸肌比值均高于健康受试者(p <.01)。这意味着这些患者的伸肌受影响更大。然而,发现患者的向心力量和离心力量之间存在很大失衡,不仅在伸肌中,在屈肌中也是如此(p <.01)。当前研究表明,在测量躯干肌肉力量时应仔细考虑测试姿势。(摘要截断于250字)