Heller M, Crocco T, Patterson J, Prestosh J, Krall J, Hill R G
Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Jul;13(4):430-1. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90132-9.
Despite widespread concern that emergency ultrasound services are not widely available after regular business hours, data supporting or refuting this concern have not been reported. To determine the availability of emergency ultrasound services as perceived by directors of emergency departments (EDs) and radiology departments, direct mail survey was sent to both ED Directors and Directors of Radiology at 100 large teaching hospitals (more than 300 beds) and 100 smaller nonteaching hospitals (fewer than 300 beds) chosen at random from the American Heart Association Guide. Questions elicited the directors' perceptions of availability of emergency ultrasound services in their own institutions as well as their attitudes toward performance of ultrasound examinations by emergency physicians. The overall response rate was 53%. It was found that 24-hour in-house ultrasound services are rarely available even in large teaching hospitals, even as reported by Directors of Radiology. ED Directors and Directors of Radiology differ significantly in perceptions of ultrasound availability, clinical importance of emergency ultrasound, and desirability of ultrasound performance by ED physicians.
尽管人们普遍担心正常工作时间之外无法广泛获得急诊超声服务,但尚未有支持或反驳这一担忧的数据报道。为了确定急诊科和放射科主任所认为的急诊超声服务的可获得性,我们向从美国心脏协会指南中随机选取的100家大型教学医院(超过300张床位)和100家小型非教学医院(少于300张床位)的急诊科主任和放射科主任发送了直接邮寄调查问卷。问题引出了主任们对其所在机构急诊超声服务可获得性的看法,以及他们对急诊医生进行超声检查的态度。总体回复率为53%。结果发现,即使在大型教学医院,24小时内部超声服务也很少见,放射科主任的报告也是如此。急诊科主任和放射科主任在超声可获得性的认知、急诊超声的临床重要性以及急诊医生进行超声检查的可取性方面存在显著差异。