• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻炎患者的外周气道阻塞

Peripheral airways obstruction in patients with rhinitis.

作者信息

Lidington R E, Cotton D J, Graham B L, Dosman J A

出版信息

Ann Allergy. 1979 Jan;42(1):28-33.

PMID:760623
Abstract

Nine young lifetime nonsmoking patients with symptoms of rhinitis but without any history of asthma or wheezing and nine age-matched healthy lifetime nonsmoking control subjects were studied with respect to subdivisions of lung volume, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume (1.0 sec), and flow-volume curves breathing air, and also breathing a mixture of 80% helium--20% oxygen (He-O2) from which were obtained airflows at 50% VC (Vmax50), the percentage increase in Vmax50 breathing He-O2 as compared to air (deltaVmax50) and the point where He-O2 and airflow-volume curves became identical (Visov). No significant differences between the two groups in age, subdivisions of lung volume or forced expiratory airflow rates were recorded. However, deltaVmax50 was significantly lower in the patients (16.4 +/- 12.0) compared to the controls (47.7 +/- 16.4) (p less than .001) and Visov was higher in the patients (28.4 +/- 14.9) as compared to the controls (14.4 +/- 7.6) (p less than .01). After bronchodilator therapy Vmax50 increased in the control subjects (p less than .005) but not in the patients and deltaVmax 50 decreased in the control group but was unchanged in the rhinitis patients. These results suggest that patients with rhinitis who have normal airflow rates may have peripheral airways obstruction not readily reversible with bronchodilators.

摘要

对9名有鼻炎症状但无哮喘或喘息病史的年轻终生不吸烟患者以及9名年龄匹配的健康终生不吸烟对照受试者进行了研究,内容包括肺容积细分、用力肺活量、用力呼气量(1.0秒)以及呼吸空气和呼吸80%氦气-20%氧气混合气体时的流量-容积曲线,从中获取50%肺活量时的气流(Vmax50)、呼吸氦氧混合气时Vmax50相对于空气的增加百分比(δVmax50)以及氦氧混合气和气流-容积曲线变得相同的点(Visov)。两组在年龄、肺容积细分或用力呼气气流速率方面无显著差异。然而,与对照组(47.7±16.4)相比,患者的δVmax50显著更低(16.4±12.0)(p<0.001),且与对照组(14.4±7.6)相比,患者的Visov更高(28.4±14.9)(p<0.01)。支气管扩张剂治疗后,对照组的Vmax50增加(p<0.005),但患者组未增加,对照组的δVmax50降低,但鼻炎患者组无变化。这些结果表明,气流速率正常的鼻炎患者可能存在外周气道阻塞,支气管扩张剂不易使其逆转。

相似文献

1
Peripheral airways obstruction in patients with rhinitis.鼻炎患者的外周气道阻塞
Ann Allergy. 1979 Jan;42(1):28-33.
2
Small airway function in acromegaly.
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1987 Jul-Aug;23(4):329-34.
3
Reproducibility of maximum flows in air and He-O2 and of delta Vmax50 in the assessment of the site of airflow limitation.在评估气流受限部位时,空气和氦氧混合气中最大流速以及Vmax50差值的可重复性。
Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1980;106:29-34.
4
Reversal of bronchial obstruction with bi-level positive airway pressure and nebulization in patients with acute asthma.双水平气道正压通气联合雾化吸入治疗急性哮喘患者支气管阻塞的逆转
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):356-61. doi: 10.1080/02770900902718829.
5
Density dependence of the maximal expiratory flow volume curves in normal and asthmatic children.正常儿童和哮喘儿童最大呼气流量容积曲线的密度依赖性
Scand J Respir Dis. 1979 Jun;60(3):109-18.
6
Flow limitation while breathing HeO2.呼吸氦氧混合气时的气流受限。
Clin Invest Med. 1993 Aug;16(4):274-9.
7
Use of maximal expiratory flow-volume curves with air and helium-oxygen in the detection of ventilatory abnormalities in population surveys.在人群调查中使用最大呼气流量-容积曲线结合空气及氦氧混合气检测通气异常情况。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Feb;123(2):234-7. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.2.234.
8
[Asthma-tobacco interaction and alterations of maximal expiratory flow in air and in helium-oxygen (author's transl)].
Poumon Coeur. 1980 May-Jun;36(3):165-70.
9
A comparison of pulmonary function tests in detecting exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.肺功能测试在检测运动诱发支气管收缩中的比较。
Pediatrics. 1975 Nov;56(5 pt-2 suppl):883-9.
10
Large airway constriction in allergic rhinitis: response to inhalation of helium-oxygen.变应性鼻炎中的大气道狭窄:对氦氧混合气吸入的反应
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1979 Jan;63(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(79)90160-x.