Suppr超能文献

知识结构与线性可分性:整合物体与社会分类中的信息

Knowledge structures and linear separability: integrating information in object and social categorization.

作者信息

Wattenmaker W D

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 1995 Jun;28(3):274-328. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1007.

Abstract

These experiments were designed to determine if the naturalness of abstract category structures varies with content domain. Specifically, the degree to which linear separability constrains categorization was investigated in object and social domains. Linearly separable (LS) categories are categories that can be perfectly partitioned on the basis of a weighted, additive combination of component information. Across a wide variety of stimulus materials and classification tasks LS structures were found to be more compatible with social than object materials. In sorting tasks, participants were more likely to sum characteristic features and form LS categories with social materials. In learning tasks, LS structures were easier to learn with social materials but nonlinearly separable structures were easier to learn with object materials. This interaction between category structure and content domain was attributed to differences in the types of knowledge and integration strategies that were activated. In object conditions, strategies that were inconsistent with adding independent features were observed (e.g., focusing on single dimensions, using configural properties, and relying on analogy). In social conditions, however, summing the evidence and learning LS structures appeared to be a natural strategy. It was concluded that the structure of knowledge varies with domain, and consequently it will be difficult to formulate domain general constraints in terms of abstract structural properties such as linear separability. Differences between object and social categorization systems are discussed.

摘要

这些实验旨在确定抽象类别结构的自然性是否随内容领域而变化。具体而言,研究了线性可分性在物体和社会领域对分类的约束程度。线性可分(LS)类别是指可以基于成分信息的加权、加法组合进行完美划分的类别。在各种刺激材料和分类任务中,发现LS结构与社会材料比与物体材料更兼容。在分类任务中,参与者更有可能对特征进行求和,并使用社会材料形成LS类别。在学习任务中,使用社会材料更容易学习LS结构,而使用物体材料更容易学习非线性可分结构。类别结构与内容领域之间的这种相互作用归因于所激活的知识类型和整合策略的差异。在物体条件下,观察到与添加独立特征不一致的策略(例如,关注单一维度、使用构型属性和依靠类比)。然而,在社会条件下,汇总证据并学习LS结构似乎是一种自然策略。得出的结论是,知识结构随领域而变化,因此,很难根据诸如线性可分性等抽象结构属性来制定领域通用的约束。讨论了物体和社会分类系统之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验