Orens J B, Kazerooni E A, Martinez F J, Curtis J L, Gross B H, Flint A, Lynch J P
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA.
Chest. 1995 Jul;108(1):109-15. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.1.109.
To assess the sensitivity of high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT) in detecting idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis proved by biopsy specimen. To determine the degree of physiologic and pathologic abnormalities in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who have a false-negative HRCT.
Prospective 2-year study.
Tertiary care university hospital.
All patients with dyspnea and suspected interstitial lung disease referred to the University of Michigan for enrollment in the Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) protocol were included; 25 underwent open lung biopsy and formed the final study group.
All patients underwent physiologic (pulmonary function, gas exchange, and exercise testing), radiologic (chest x-ray film and HRCT), and pathologic assessments (bronchoscopic and open lung biopsy). The results of HRCT were prospectively compared with results of standard pulmonary function tests, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and open lung biopsy.
Of 25 patients who had both HRCT and open lung biopsy, 3 patients (12%) had HRCTs that demonstrated no evidence of interstitial lung disease. These three patients had less severe disease based on clinical, radiographic, and physiologic (CRP) scores, gas exchange abnormalities, and pathologic scoring of open lung biopsy specimens, compared with those with an abnormal HRCT.
We conclude that in the evaluation of patients with dyspnea and abnormal results of pulmonary function studies, a normal HRCT does not exclude early and clinically significant interstitial lung disease. In our patient population, physiologic testing was more sensitive than HRCT in detecting mild abnormalities in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis proved by biopsy specimen.
评估高分辨率胸部计算机断层扫描(HRCT)对经活检标本证实的特发性肺纤维化的检测敏感性。确定HRCT结果为假阴性的特发性肺纤维化患者的生理和病理异常程度。
为期2年的前瞻性研究。
三级医疗大学医院。
所有因呼吸困难和疑似间质性肺疾病转诊至密歇根大学并纳入特发性肺纤维化专门研究中心(SCOR)方案的患者;25例接受了开胸肺活检,组成了最终研究组。
所有患者均接受了生理(肺功能、气体交换和运动测试)、放射学(胸部X线片和HRCT)和病理评估(支气管镜检查和开胸肺活检)。将HRCT结果与标准肺功能测试、心肺运动测试和开胸肺活检结果进行前瞻性比较。
在25例同时进行了HRCT和开胸肺活检的患者中,3例(12%)的HRCT显示无间质性肺疾病证据。与HRCT异常的患者相比,这3例患者基于临床、影像学和生理(CRP)评分、气体交换异常以及开胸肺活检标本的病理评分,疾病程度较轻。
我们得出结论,在评估有呼吸困难且肺功能研究结果异常的患者时,HRCT正常并不能排除早期且具有临床意义的间质性肺疾病。在我们的患者群体中,生理测试在检测经活检标本证实的特发性肺纤维化患者的轻度异常方面比HRCT更敏感。