Benninga M A, Büller H A, Staalman C R, Gubler F M, Bossuyt P M, van der Plas R N, Taminiau J A
Department of Paediatrics, Academical Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Pediatr. 1995 Apr;154(4):277-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01957362.
It is still unclear how to evaluate the existence of faecal retention or impaction in children with defaecation disorders. To objectivate the presence and degree of constipation we measured segmental and total colonic transit times (CTT) using radio-opaque markers in 211 constipated children. On clinical grounds, patients (median age 8 years (5-14 years)) could be divided into three groups; constipation, isolated encopresis/soiling and recurrent abdominal pain. Barr-scores, a method for assessment of stool retention using plain abdominal radiographs, were obtained in the first 101 patients, for comparison with CTT measurements as to the clinical outcome. Of the children with constipation, 48% showed significantly prolonged total and segmental CTT. Surprisingly, 91% and 91%, respectively, of the encopresis/soiling and recurrent abdominal pain children had a total CTT within normal limits, suggesting that no motility disorder was present. Prolonged CTT through all segments, known as colonic inertia, was found in the constipation group only. Based on significant differences in clinical presentation, CTT and colonic transit patterns, encopresis/soiling children formed a separate entity among children with defaecation disorders, compared to children with constipation. Recurrent abdominal pain in children was in the great majority, not related to constipation. Barr-scores were poorly reproducible, with low inter- and intra-observer reliability. This is the first study which shows that clinical differences in constipated children are associated with different colonic transit patterns. The usefulness of CTT measurements lies in the objectivation of complaints and the discrimination of certain transit patterns. Conclusion. Abdominal radiographs, even when assessed with the Barr-score proved unreliable in diagnosing constipation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
目前仍不清楚如何评估排便障碍儿童中粪便潴留或嵌塞的存在情况。为了客观确定便秘的存在及程度,我们使用不透X线标志物对211名便秘儿童进行了节段性和全结肠转运时间(CTT)的测量。基于临床情况,患者(中位年龄8岁(5 - 14岁))可分为三组:便秘、孤立性遗粪/弄脏内裤和复发性腹痛。对前101名患者进行了Barr评分(一种使用腹部平片评估粪便潴留的方法),以便与CTT测量结果在临床结果方面进行比较。便秘儿童中,48%的患者全结肠和节段性CTT显著延长。令人惊讶的是,遗粪/弄脏内裤和复发性腹痛儿童中分别有91%的患者全结肠转运时间在正常范围内,这表明不存在动力障碍。仅在便秘组中发现所有节段的CTT延长,即结肠惰性。基于临床表现、CTT和结肠转运模式的显著差异,与便秘儿童相比,遗粪/弄脏内裤儿童在排便障碍儿童中构成了一个单独的类别。儿童复发性腹痛在大多数情况下与便秘无关。Barr评分的可重复性较差,观察者间和观察者内的可靠性较低。这是第一项表明便秘儿童的临床差异与不同结肠转运模式相关的研究。CTT测量的有用性在于使症状客观化以及区分某些转运模式。结论。腹部平片,即使采用Barr评分进行评估,在诊断便秘方面也被证明不可靠。(摘要截断于250字)