Mount Graham J
Visiting Research Fellow, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, South Australia.
J Conserv Dent. 2008 Jan;11(1):3-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.43411.
It is over 100 years since G V black gathered together most of the knowledge then current on the caries process and set clear parameters for the discipline of operative dentistry. His four-volume treatise set standards that were relevant for the times and, in fact, were so well described that they remained dominant in this discipline until quite recently. However, over the last 50 years there has been great progress in scientific method and in knowledge of the common diseases of the oral environment, including the caries process, so maybe it is time for change. The term "paradigm" describes a philosophy of science, a generally accepted model of how ideas relate to one another, forming a conceptual framework within which scientific research is carried out. Black defined the paradigm within which further research was to be conducted during the following years and the profession accepted his lead. However, it is not expected that the parameters of a profession should remain unchanged over a substantial period so it is suggested that the dental profession should, at this time, recognize a new paradigm. Improvements in scientific method have led to a better understanding of the oral environment, resulting in extensive changes for this profession. It is suggested that the standards set by Black should be now consigned to history and an entirely new paradigm adopted. First, the profession must recognize that dental caries is a bacterial disease and its primary efforts should be directed towards identification and elimination of the disease prior to initiating repair of the damage that it has caused. Preservation of natural tooth structure is then the next responsibility. There should be maximum use made of preventive strategies, including remineralization, followed by minimal intervention cavity designs and the use of bioactive restorative materials to restore the lesions. The profession should be prepared to move on.
自G·V·布莱克汇总了当时有关龋病进程的大部分知识,并为牙体牙髓病学学科设定了明确参数以来,已经过去了100多年。他的四卷本专著设定了符合当时情况的标准,事实上,这些标准描述得非常完善,直到最近在该学科中仍占据主导地位。然而,在过去的50年里,科学方法以及对口腔环境常见疾病(包括龋病进程)的认识都取得了巨大进展,所以或许是时候做出改变了。“范式”一词描述的是一种科学哲学,是一种关于各种观点如何相互关联的普遍接受的模型,形成了一个进行科学研究的概念框架。布莱克定义了在接下来的几年里进行进一步研究的范式,该行业也接受了他的引领。然而,预计一个行业的参数在相当长的一段时间内不应保持不变,因此有人建议牙科行业此时应认识到一种新的范式。科学方法的改进使人们对口腔环境有了更好的理解,给这个行业带来了广泛的变化。有人建议,布莱克设定的标准现在应该被载入史册,采用一种全新的范式。首先,该行业必须认识到龋齿是一种细菌性疾病,其首要努力方向应该是在修复其造成的损害之前识别并消除这种疾病。然后,保护天然牙体结构是下一个责任。应最大限度地利用预防策略,包括再矿化,其次是采用微创窝洞设计,并使用生物活性修复材料来修复病损。该行业应该准备好向前迈进。