Mealey B L, Neubauer M F, Butzin C A, Waldrop T C
Department of Periodontics, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, TX, USA.
J Periodontol. 1994 Jul;65(7):649-57. doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.7.649.
Accurate diagnosis of periodontal destruction in the furcation region of multi-rooted teeth is a critical component of treatment planning, with different therapeutic approaches chosen based upon clinical determination of the severity of involvement. The current study assessed both vertical and horizontal depths of 274 furcations from 67 patients at three separate time points: by probing prior to anesthesia, by bone sounding after administration of anesthesia, and by direct measurement at the time of surgery. All measurements were made to the nearest millimeter. The mean vertical (1.8 mm) and horizontal (2.16 mm) furcation depths determined prior to anesthesia were significantly less than surgical measurements (2.79 mm and 3.65 mm, respectively). Use of sounding significantly improved the mean accuracy of vertical (2.40 mm) and horizontal (3.11 mm) furcation depth measurements relative to surgical determinations (P = 0.000). Surgical vertical depth was exactly the same as pre-anesthesia probing in 42% of furcations, within +/- 1 mm in 72.3% and within +/- 2 mm in 83.6%. Use of post-anesthesia sounding improved agreement in vertical measurements to 59.5%, 85.7%, and 93.1%, respectively. Surgical horizontal depth was exactly the same as pre-anesthesia probing measurements in 47.1% of furcations, within +/- 1 mm in 68.3% and within +/- 2 mm in 77.4%. Sounding improved agreement of horizontal measurements to 64.2%, 83.6%, and 88.3%, respectively. Underestimation of surgical furcation depths by pre-anesthesia probing was much more common than overestimation. Sounding reduced the percent and degree of underestimation in all furcation types. The data demonstrate the ability of post-anesthesia bone sounding to significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of furcation invasions.
准确诊断多根牙根分叉区的牙周破坏情况是治疗计划的关键组成部分,需根据临床确定的病变严重程度选择不同的治疗方法。本研究在三个不同时间点评估了67例患者274个根分叉区的垂直和水平深度:麻醉前探诊、麻醉后骨探测以及手术时直接测量。所有测量精确到毫米。麻醉前确定的平均垂直(1.8毫米)和水平(2.16毫米)根分叉深度显著小于手术测量值(分别为2.79毫米和3.65毫米)。与手术测量相比,使用探测法显著提高了垂直(2.40毫米)和水平(3.11毫米)根分叉深度测量的平均准确性(P = 0.000)。42%的根分叉区手术垂直深度与麻醉前探诊完全相同,72.3%在±1毫米范围内,83.6%在±2毫米范围内。使用麻醉后探测法分别将垂直测量的一致性提高到59.5%、85.7%和93.1%。47.1%的根分叉区手术水平深度与麻醉前探诊测量完全相同,68.3%在±1毫米范围内,77.4%在±2毫米范围内。探测法分别将水平测量的一致性提高到64.2%、83.6%和88.3%。麻醉前探诊低估手术根分叉深度比高估更为常见。探测法降低了所有根分叉类型低估的百分比和程度。数据表明麻醉后骨探测能够显著提高根分叉侵犯的诊断准确性。