Suppr超能文献

临床根分叉病变诊断及根间骨缺损

Clinical furcation diagnoses and interradicular bone defects.

作者信息

Zappa U, Grosso L, Simona C, Graf H, Case D

机构信息

School of Dental Medicine, Department of Periodontology, University of Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1993 Mar;64(3):219-27. doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.3.219.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess associations between clinical depth of involved furcations and their bony defect depth. Twelve patients with moderate to advanced periodontitis in molars were recruited for clinical evaluation of furcation involvement by 6 dentists. Two groups of 3 dentists were assigned to the right or left half of the dentition. All dentists assessed the clinical depth of involvement of the furcations using the Ramfjord index (2 mm) in patients 1 through 6, and using the Hamp index (3 mm) in patients 7 through 12. Diagnoses were made with calibrated and uncalibrated Nabers 2 probes. After the clinical assessments the patients received full mouth scaling and root planing. After reevaluation the molars were surgically exposed. During surgery the depth of the bony furcation defects was assessed using horizontal probing and impressions. Clinically assessed depth of furcation involvement was then compared with the surgical measurements. A total of 1,180 clinical furcation diagnoses were available, of which 426 could be surgically evaluated using both the straight probe and the impressions. These evaluations were done in a total of 72 furcations using probe and impressions. For the Ramfjord index, 5% of the clinical degree 1, 40% of the degree 2, and 43% of the degree 3 readings were overestimations. For the Hamp index, 7% of degree 1, 24% of degree 2, and 0% of degree 3 readings were overestimations. These clinical diagnoses were overestimations. Forty-three percent of surgical degree 3 involvements were not recognized when using the Ramfjord index, and 27% when using the Hamp Index. These results suggest that furcation diagnosis is of limited validity.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估受累根分叉的临床深度与其骨缺损深度之间的关联。招募了12例患有中度至重度磨牙牙周炎的患者,由6名牙医对根分叉病变进行临床评估。两组3名牙医分别负责牙列的右半侧或左半侧。所有牙医对1至6号患者使用Ramfjord指数(2毫米)评估根分叉受累的临床深度,对7至12号患者使用Hamp指数(3毫米)。使用校准和未校准的Nabers 2探针进行诊断。临床评估后,患者接受全口洁治和根面平整。重新评估后,磨牙进行手术暴露。手术过程中,使用水平探查和印模评估骨根分叉缺损的深度。然后将临床评估的根分叉受累深度与手术测量结果进行比较。总共获得了1180例临床根分叉诊断,其中426例可通过直探针和印模进行手术评估。这些评估共在72个根分叉中使用探针和印模完成。对于Ramfjord指数,1级临床诊断中有5%、2级中有40%、3级中有43%的读数被高估。对于Hamp指数,1级中有7%、2级中有24%、3级中有0%的读数被高估。这些临床诊断为高估。使用Ramfjord指数时,43%的手术3级受累未被识别,使用Hamp指数时为27%。这些结果表明根分叉诊断的有效性有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验