Newman M G, Kornman K S, Doherty F M
Medical Science Systems, San Antonio, TX, USA.
J Periodontol. 1994 Jul;65(7):685-91. doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.7.685.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of scaling and root planing (S and RP) alone versus tetracycline fiber therapy used adjunctively with S and RP in the treatment of localized recurrent periodontitis sites in maintenance patients. A total of 113 patients receiving regular supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) were treated with whole mouth S and RP. Two non-adjacent sites in separate quadrants were selected in each patient for monitoring based on criteria that the sites were 5 to 8 mm deep and had a history of bleeding on probing. The chosen sites were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months. At 1, 3 and 6 months, adjunctive fiber therapy was significantly better in reducing PD (P < 0.05) and reducing BOP (P < 0.05) than S and RP alone. At 6 months, fiber therapy was significantly better in promoting clinical attachment gain (P < 0.05) than S and RP alone. Overall, these results indicate that fiber therapy significantly enhanced the effectiveness of S and RP in the management of localized recurrent periodontitis sites, in patients receiving regular supportive periodontal treatment.
本研究的目的是比较单纯龈下刮治和根面平整术(S和RP)与四环素纤维疗法辅助S和RP治疗维持期患者局限性复发性牙周炎部位的疗效。共有113名接受定期牙周支持治疗(SPT)的患者接受了全口S和RP治疗。根据探诊深度为5至8毫米且有探诊出血史的标准,在每位患者的不同象限中选择两个不相邻的部位进行监测。将所选部位随机分配到两个治疗组之一。在基线以及1、3和6个月时测量探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血(BOP)和临床附着水平(CAL)。在1、3和6个月时,辅助纤维疗法在降低PD(P < 0.05)和减少BOP(P < 0.05)方面明显优于单纯的S和RP。在6个月时,纤维疗法在促进临床附着增加方面(P < 0.05)明显优于单纯的S和RP。总体而言,这些结果表明,在接受定期牙周支持治疗的患者中,纤维疗法显著提高了S和RP治疗局限性复发性牙周炎部位的有效性。