Vallittu P K
Department of Prosthetics and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Kuopio, Finland.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1995 Apr;53(2):99-104. doi: 10.3109/00016359509005954.
The objective of this study was to compare bonding of acrylic resin teeth treated in various ways to the polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base material. The joint surface of each acrylic tooth cured to heat-cured or autopolymerizing PMMA was either untreated, ground, or adjusted with mechanical retention. The bond to the PMMA was tested with a three-point loading test. To determine whether the bond failure was adhesive or cohesive, the fracture surfaces were analyzed visually and by scanning electron microscopy. The highest bond strength to both the heat-cured and the autopolymerizing PMMA was obtained by grinding grooves on the joint surface of an acrylic resin tooth before it was cured to the PMMA (p < 0.001). Heat-cured PMMA did not adhere to the acrylic resin tooth better than the autopolymerizing PMMA did (p > 0.05).
本研究的目的是比较经不同方式处理的丙烯酸树脂牙与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿基托材料的粘结情况。每个固化到热固化或自凝PMMA上的丙烯酸树脂牙的结合面,要么不做处理,要么进行打磨,要么采用机械固位进行调整。通过三点加载试验测试与PMMA的粘结力。为了确定粘结失败是粘结性的还是内聚性的,通过肉眼和扫描电子显微镜对断裂面进行分析。在丙烯酸树脂牙固化到PMMA之前,通过在其结合面上打磨凹槽,可获得与热固化和自凝PMMA的最高粘结强度(p < 0.001)。热固化PMMA对丙烯酸树脂牙的粘结效果并不比自凝PMMA更好(p > 0.05)。